Hybrid binary catalysts, methods and uses thereof

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure describes hybrid binary catalysts (HBCs) that can be used as engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions. The HBCs provide solutions to the challenges facing emissions control. In general, the HBCs include a porous primary catalyst and a secondary catalyst. The secondary catalyst partial coats the surfaces (e.g., the internal porous surface and/or the external surface) of the primary catalyst resulting in a hybridized composition. The synthesis of the HBCs can provide a primary catalyst whose entire surface, or portions thereof, can be coated with the secondary catalyst.

BACKGROUND

Internal combustion engine exhaust emissions, and especially diesel engine exhaust emissions, have recently come under scrutiny with the advent of stricter regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad. While diesel engines are known to be more economical to run than spark-ignited engines, diesel engines inherently suffer disadvantages in the area of emissions. For example, in a diesel engine, fuel is injected during the compression stroke, as opposed to during the intake stroke in a spark-ignited engine. As a result, a diesel engine has less time to thoroughly mix the air and fuel before ignition occurs. The consequence is that diesel engine exhaust contains incompletely burned fuel known as particulate matter, or “soot”. In addition to particulate matter, internal combustion engines including diesel engines produce a number of combustion products including hydrocarbons (“HC”), carbon monoxide (“CO”), nitrogen oxides (“NO_(x)”), and sulfur oxides (“SO_(x)”). Aftertreatment systems may be utilized to reduce or eliminate emissions of these and other combustion products.

FIG. 1A shows a block diagram providing a brief overview of a vehicle powertrain. The components include an internal combustion engine 20 in flow communication with one or more selected components of an exhaust aftertreatment system 24. The exhaust aftertreatment system 24 optionally includes a catalyst system 96 upstream of a particulate filter 100. In the embodiment shown, the catalyst system 96 is a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) 96 coupled in flow communication to receive and treat exhaust from the engine 20. The DOC 96 is preferably a flow-through device that includes either a honeycomb-like or plate-like substrate. The substrate has a surface area that includes (e.g., is coated with) a catalyst. The catalyst can be an oxidation catalyst, which can include a precious metal catalyst, such as platinum or palladium, for rapid conversion of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitric oxides in the engine exhaust gas into carbon dioxide, nitrogen, water, or NO₂.

Once the exhaust has flowed through DOC 96, the diesel particulate filter (DPF) 100 is utilized to capture unwanted diesel particulate matter from the flow of exhaust gas exiting engine 20, by flowing exhaust across the walls of DPF channels. The diesel particulate matter includes sub-micron sized solid and liquid particles found in diesel exhaust. The DPF 100 can be manufactured from a variety of materials including but not limited to cordierite, silicon carbide, and/or other high temperature oxide ceramics.

The treated exhaust gases can then proceed through a compartment containing a diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) doser 102 for the introduction of a reductant, such as ammonia or a urea solution. The exhaust gases then flow to a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system 104, which can include a catalytic core having a selective catalytic reduction catalyst (SCR catalyst) loaded thereon.

System 24 can include one or more sensors (not illustrated) associated with components of the system 24, such as one or more temperature sensors, NO_(x) sensor, NH₃ sensor, oxygen sensor, mass flow sensor, particulate sensor, and a pressure sensor.

As discussed above, the exhaust aftertreatment system 24 includes a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system 104. The SCR system 104 includes a selective catalytic reduction catalyst which interacts with NO_(x) gases to convert the NO_(x) gases into N₂ and water, in the presence of an ammonia reductant. The overall reactions of NO_(x) reductions in SCR are shown below. 4NO+4NH₃+O₂→4N₂+6H₂O  (1) 6NO₂+8NH₃→7N₂+12H₂O  (2) 2NH₃+NO+NO₂→2N₂+3H₂O  (3)

Where Equation (1) represents a standard SCR reaction and Equation (3) represents a fast SCR reaction.

The performance of the SCR catalyst is often counterbalanced by catalyst durability. This challenge is further compounded by the increasingly stringent emissions regulatory demands on the one hand, and the economic pressure surrounding fuel economy on the other. Furthermore, the performance of the SCR catalyst is influenced by the level of engine out NO_(x) (EO NO_(x)) that has to be processed by the SCR catalyst. The current trend is in the direction of higher engine out NO_(x) to improve fuel economy, while emission levels are simultaneously being reduced. For example, at present, EO NO_(x) can reach as high as 7 g/kW-hr for at least a short period of time. However, it is anticipated that in the future, there will be a move towards very low tailpipe NO_(x) (e.g., decreasing from about 0.2 to about 0.02 g/kW-hr).

High EO NO_(x) has been shown to result in urea deposit build up in the SCR, due to the extremely high levels of diesel exhaust fluid that is introduced into the system, and insufficient residence time for complete decomposition to form NH₃. The formation and accumulation of urea deposits on the SCR catalyst can result in severe damage to both the chemical and physical integrity of the SCR coating. Furthermore, the high intensity of diesel exhaust fluid dosing and the relatively long duration of the dosing in urea decomposition reactor 102 can result in large quantities of water being released onto the SCR catalyst. As the SCR catalyst can be primarily composed of zeolites, which are powerful water adsorbing materials, the quantities of water can present a problem with both durability and cold start performance of the SCR catalyst.

At low EO NO_(x) conditions, challenges are similar to those present under extended idling and cold start conditions. In other words, when SCR temperatures are too low for diesel exhaust fluid dosing and normal SCR operation (between about 250-450° C.), other strategies are required to meet emissions standards.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the advent of engine gas recirculation (EGR) has resulted in reduced peak in-cylinder temperatures for combustion to reduce engine out NO_(x). The reduced peak in-cylinder temperatures are highly desirable from an emissions control perspective. However, the lower peak in-cylinder temperatures also result in undesirable lower fuel economy. The reduced engine exhaust temperatures that result from increasing use of EGR also have a negative impact on cold-start conditions for engine aftertreatment system (EAS) performance. Effective emissions control by EAS requires temperatures of at least 200° C. to be attained before DEF dosing may commence. Therefore, during the EAS heat-up period under cold-start conditions (i.e., at temperatures of less than 200° C.), there is no emissions control.

Some challenges that are encountered in emissions control include:

(1) Cold-start conditions with relatively low engine exhaust temperatures can be addressed by close coupling the SCR to the engine to achieve maximum heat-up rate, with exposure of the SCR catalyst to non-pretreated exhaust directly from the engine. However, only partial NO_(x) reduction can be achieved in this manner. Therefore, a second downstream SCR (or a SCRF) will be required.

(2) Increased system size and complexity arise when the EAS includes a close coupled zeolite-based SCR, therefore, a DOC upstream of the SCR is required for NO₂-make for optimal performance, with a DEF doser and an ammonia slip catalyst (ASC), also called an ammonia oxidation catalyst (AMOX), downstream of the SCR to decrease NH₃ slip into the DOC. In some embodiments, while a close coupled vanadia-based SCR would not require a DOC upstream of the SCR, there exists a risk of sublimed vanadium escaping into the environment.

(3) Space limitations for close coupling requires that the EAS be made more compact, for example, by combining SCR and DPF to form a SCRF, which presents the following challenges:

-   -   (i) Competition between the fast SCR reaction and soot oxidation         reaction for the available NO₂ from the DOC;     -   (ii) No passive soot oxidation, because platinum group metals         (PGMs) cannot be used on the DPF substrate due to the presence         of NH₃ for the SCR reaction. Oxidation of NH₃ with PGMs also         produces N₂O, which is an undesirable greenhouse gas.     -   (iii) Finally, the reduced ash loading capacity of the SCRF         relative to a DPF and the associated higher pressure change (AP)         dictate a shorter ash cleaning interval and cost of ownership         for the customer.

(4) The potential for increased poisoning and hydrothermal aging of EAS catalysts are a major concern that arises from both close coupling of the SCR and in particular, when SCR on DPF (i.e., SCRF) technologies are employed.

(5) Increasingly stringent emissions regulations are expected to be enforced by the year 2021; including tailpipe (TP) NO_(x)≤0.02 g/kw-hr, lower N₂O emissions standards, and generally tightened greenhouse gas regulation.

Thus, there is a need for engine aftertreatment catalysts that can address the challenges facing emission control. The present disclosure seeks to fulfill these needs and provides further related advantages.

SUMMARY

This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

In one aspect, the disclosure features an engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, including a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles hybridized to a metal zeolite, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 50 nm.

In another aspect, the disclosure features a method of making an engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, including providing an aqueous solution including a chelating agent and a metal oxide precursor selected from ZrOCl₂.8H₂O, NaVO₃, BaCl₂, (NH₄)₆Ce⁴⁺(NO₃)₄, KMnO₄, Co(NO₃)₂, Cr(NO₃)₃, CaCl₂, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, nickel nitrate, titanium chloride, and tungsten chloride; mixing the aqueous solution comprising the chelating agent and the metal oxide precursor with a metal zeolite to provide a metal oxide precursor-coated metal zeolite, and calcining the metal oxide precursor-coated metal zeolite to provide the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, wherein the engine after treatment catalyst composition includes a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles bound to the metal zeolite.

In yet another aspect, the disclosure features a method of reducing NO_(x) in diesel engine exhaust in a selective catalytic reduction system, including exposing a NO_(x)-containing diesel engine exhaust to a catalyst composition described above, wherein the catalyst composition is disposed on or within a catalyst support structure.

Embodiments can include one or more of the following features.

The metal oxide in the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition described above can be hybridized to atoms located on a portion of an exterior surface of the metal zeolite. In any of the above-described embodiments, the metal oxide nanoparticle can have a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 30 nm (e.g., from 0.1 to 10 nm, or from 0.1 to 5 nm); the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition can have from 0.5 wt % to 50 wt % (e.g., from 0.5 wt % to 30 wt %) of a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles; the metal oxide nanoparticle can be selected from cerium oxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide, silicon oxide, hafnium oxide, vanadium oxide, niobium oxide, tantalum oxide, chromium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, ruthenium oxide, rhodium oxide, iridium oxide, nickel oxide, barium oxide, yttrium oxide, scandium oxide, calcium oxide, barium oxide, manganese oxide, lanthanum oxide, strontium oxide, cobalt oxide, and any combination thereof; and/or the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from the group consisting of zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, cerium oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, cobalt oxide, titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, barium oxide, and any combination thereof.

In any of the above-described engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions, the metal oxide nanoparticle can further include a cationic dopant; the cationic dopant can be an oxide including Mg²⁺, Cu²⁺Cu⁺, Ni²⁺, Ti⁴⁺, V⁴⁺, Nb⁴⁺, Ta⁵⁺, Cr³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Mo³⁺, W⁶⁺, W³⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺, Zn²⁺, Ga³⁺, Al³⁺, In³⁺, Ge⁴⁺, Si⁴⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Ba²⁺, La³⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Nb⁵⁺, Sr²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, and any combination thereof; and/or the cationic dopant can be an oxide including Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Rh²⁺.

In any of the above-described engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions, the metal oxide nanoparticle can be selected from CeO₂:ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:CeO₂, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr and Ca cations of the metal oxide, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr cations of the metal oxide, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba, Zr, and Co cations of the metal oxide, TiO₂:CeO₂, ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr, Ba, and V cations of the metal oxide, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, each optionally comprising a cationic dopant comprising an oxide of Ba²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and any combination thereof; the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr cations of the metal oxide, and CeO₂:ZrO₂; and/or the metal oxide nanoparticle can further include phosphorus.

In any of the above-described engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions, the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition can have from 50 wt % to 99.5 wt % (e.g., from 30 wt % to 99.5 wt %) of the metal zeolite; the metal zeolite can be selected from aluminosilicate zeolites and silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites; the metal zeolite can further include a cation selected from Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Fe³⁺, and wherein the metal zeolite optionally includes an alkali metal ion selected from Na⁺ and K⁺; the metal zeolite can be selected from Fe-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Fe- and Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Fe-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites, Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites, and Fe and Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites; the metal zeolite can be selected from Fe-doped chabazite, Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, and Fe and Cu-doped chabazite; the metal zeolite can be selected from ZSM-5, β-zeolite, SSZ-13 chabazite, and SAPO-34; and/or the metal zeolite can be SAPO-34. In some embodiments, the metal zeolite is Fe and/or Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite, and Fe- and/or Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolite, in combination.

In any of the above-described engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions, the catalyst composition can have a thermal resistance of up to 600° C.; and/or the catalyst composition can have a BET surface area of at least 200 m²/g.

Embodiments of the engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions of the present disclosure can be a diesel oxidation catalyst, a diesel particulate filter catalyst, a selective catalytic reduction catalyst, a urea hydrolysis catalyst, and/or an ammonia oxidation catalyst.

The urea hydrolysis catalyst can have a NO_(x) conversion efficiency of at least 10%, when coated onto a surface of an impact static mixer, and wherein the urea hydrolysis catalyst is capable of decomposing urea to produce ammonia reductant in a diesel engine exhaust stream. The urea hydrolysis catalyst can bind and oxidize SCR catalyst poisons, such as hydrocarbons, sulfur, or a combination thereof. The urea hydrolysis catalyst can be a sacrificial catalyst.

In the above-described method of reducing NO_(x), the catalyst support structure can be selected from a ceramic monolith and a metallic substrate; the catalyst composition is capable of decomposing urea deposits; and/or the catalyst composition increases NO_(x) reduction under cold start conditions.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this disclosure will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1A is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 1B is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 1C is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 1D is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 1E is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 1F is a block diagram of an example an aftertreatment system close coupled to an internal combustion engine with a DOC (POC) upstream of a SCRF.

FIG. 2 is graphical representation of an embodiment of a particle of a primary catalyst, showing mesopores and catalytic surfaces within the particle.

FIG. 3 is graphical representation of a mesoporous space within a hybrid binary catalyst (HBC) particle.

FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of oxidation/reduction reaction on discrete sites within and/or on the surface of an HBC particle.

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of an aftertreatment system coupled to an internal combustion engine.

FIG. 6A is a scanning electron micrograph of an embodiment β-Zeolite before hybridization with Ba_((0.4))Zr_((0.6))O₃ nanoparticles.

FIG. 6B is a scanning electron micrograph of an embodiment β-Zeolite after hybridization with Ba_((0.4))Zr_((0.6))O₃ nanoparticles. Relatively uniform distribution of nanoparticles was facilitated by the use of surfactant poly(ethyleneglycol-ran-polypropyleneglycol) in the hybridization of the Zr and Ba precursors to the β-zeolite particles. See also Table 2, item 8, below.

FIG. 7 is a scanning electron micrograph of an embodiment of a Type-A HBC based on mesoporous chabazite SSZ-13 (Si/Al=12), with ZrO₂ nanoparticles.

FIG. 8 is a scanning transmission electron micrograph of an embodiment of a Type-A HBC based on mesoporous SSZ-13 (Si/Ai=12)/ZrO₂. Elemental mapping of the Type-A mesoporous SSZ-13 (Si/Ai=12) Hybrid binary catalyst with ZrO₂ nanoparticles (2-5 nm diameter) revealed the presence of the elements silicon (Si) and aluminum (Al) in the metal oxide phase (as well as in the zeolite phase). This presents clear evidence of the covalent reaction between the precursors with zeolite surface groups during the hybridization process. In addition, this has been verified by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analysis. The 2-5 nm diameter crystalline metal oxide (SCO phase) particles are arranged in a discontinuous network across the entire internal and external surfaces of the zeolite crystal.

FIG. 9 is a scanning electron micrograph of structural characteristics of an embodiment of a HBC of the present disclosure, SSZ-13 chabazite HBC with zirconium-barium mixed metal oxide showing the 2-5 diameter crystalline metal oxide (SCO phase) particles arranged in a discontinuous network across the entire zeolite surface.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure describes hybrid binary catalysts (HBCs) that can be used in engine aftertreatment catalyst compositions. The HBCs provide solutions to the challenges facing emissions control. In general, the HBCs include a primary catalyst that can be a highly porous particle and a secondary catalyst. The secondary catalyst coats the surfaces (e.g., the internal porous surface and/or the external surface) of the primary catalyst. The syntheses described herein of the HBCs provide a primary catalyst whose entire surface, or portions thereof, are coated with discrete and identifiable crystals of the secondary catalyst. The crystals can have a maximum dimension of from 1 to 5 nm.

The HBCs of the present disclosure can include specific chemical elements that possess the desired electronegativities for the various chemical reactions that occur in an engine aftertreatment system. Table 1 shows a list of suitable elements with desirable electronegativity values that can be used in the HBCs, as well as the oxidation states of these elements that can be present in the HBCs. In some embodiments, the HBCs include Ba (barium), Co (cobalt), Zr (zirconium), and/or P (phosphorus).

TABLE 1 Electronegativity and oxidation states of selected elements from the periodic table. Electronegativity Period Group Element (Paulings) Oxidation State 4 Alkaline earth Ca 1 1⁺, 2⁺ 5 Alkaline earth Sr 0.95 2⁺ 6 Alkaline earth Ba 0.89 1⁺, 2⁺ 3 3A Al 1.61 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, [1⁻, 2⁻, 3⁻] 4A Si 1.90 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, [1⁻, 2⁻, 3⁻, 4⁻] 4 Transition metal Sc 1.36 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺ Transition metal Ti 1.54 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺ [1⁻, 2⁻] Transition metal V 1.63 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺ [3⁻] Transition metal Cr 1.66 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺, 6⁺ [1⁻, 2⁻, 4⁻] Transition metal Mn 1.56 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺, 6⁺, 7⁺ [1⁻, 2⁻, 3⁻] Transition metal Fe 1.83 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺, 6⁺ [1⁻, 2⁻, 4⁻] Transition metal Co 1.88 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺ [3⁻] Transition metal Ni 1.91 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺ [1⁻, 2⁺] Transition metal Cu 1.9 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺ [2⁻] Transition metal Zn 1.65 1⁺, 2⁺ [0, 2⁻] 5 Transition metal Y 1.22 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺ Transition metal Zr 1.33 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺ [2⁻] Transition metal Nb 1.6 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺ [1⁻, 3⁻] Transition metal Mo 2.16 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺, 6⁺ [0, 1⁻, 2⁻, 4⁻] Transition metal W 1.7 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺, 5⁺, 6⁺ [0, 1⁻, 2⁻, 4⁻] 6 Lanthanide Ce 1.12 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4⁺ 3 5A P 2.19 1⁺, 2⁺, 3⁺, 4, 5⁺ [1⁻, 2⁻, 3⁻]

The catalysts of the present disclosure provide one or more of the following benefits:

(1) The catalysts include a refractory metal oxide that is abundant and relatively low cost, durable and with relatively low oxidative power (e.g., ZrO₂).

(2) The catalysts use dopants to create oxygen vacancies in the crystal lattice and at the surfaces of metal oxide (e.g., zirconium dioxide). The dopants (e.g., Ba²⁺, Ca²⁺, or Sr²⁺) are relatively low in cost and have reductive power that can counterbalance the oxidative power of the metal oxide, while positively impacting NO_(x) storage on the surface.

(3) The catalysts incorporate selected high oxidative power species (e.g., Ti, Co, Cr, Mn, Nb, V, Mo, and/or W-containing oxides) into a mixed metal oxide structure, to tailor the final oxidative power according to a specific application. The high oxidative power species can be employed in different oxidation states as needed. For example, a species having high oxidative power (1.5-2.2 Paulings) is useful for DOC applications, while a species having relatively moderate (1 to <1.5 Paulings) to low oxidative power (<1.0 Paulings) is useful for high durability SCR applications. One major exception is cerium (a lanthanide element), with electronegativity that falls in the moderate range but is also very effective for DOC application.

Some considerations for the oxidative properties of the HBC include:

(i) without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the oxidative power of the final (zirconia doped) mixed oxide is important, therefore elements with high Pauling values can be used in SCR applications at relatively low doping levels. At higher doping levels, the same element can be highly effective in DOC applications.

(ii) without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the valency of the element plays an important role in the observed oxidative power. Therefore, selection of a element having a low valence state (e.g., 2+, such as Co²⁺) as a dopant in ZrO₂ can be useful in SCR application, while an element having high valence (≥3+) can be more preferred in DOC applications.

The catalysts incorporate acidic (i.e., anionic) groups, such as PO₄ ²⁻ in zirconium phosphate, VO₄ ³⁻ in zirconium vanadate, ZrO₃ ²⁻ in barium zirconate, and/or Mo₇ ⁶⁻ in zirconium molybdate, which facilitate high binding capacity for cations that provide catalytic activity in emissions control. For example, Cu²⁺ and/or Fe²⁺ can be used for NO_(x) reduction; and Pt²⁺/Pt⁰, other platinum-group metals (PGMs) and certain base metals (e.g., Ni²⁺ and Fe³⁺) can facilitate oxidative reactions required for DOC and AMOX catalysts.

The use of phosphorous in the metal oxide composition of the catalysts can modulate oxidative power while imparting a degree of phosphate tolerance to the catalyst.

Definitions

As used herein, “hybridization,” “hybridizing,” or “hybridized” refers to the chemical reaction between precursor molecules with specific elements on the surface of the zeolite, resulting in formation of bonds (e.g., covalent bonds, and/or ionic bonds) between the precursors and elements in the zeolite in the metal oxide nanoparticles. The hybridization can be verified using scanning transmission electron microscopy with elemental analysis and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) microstructural analysis techniques. For example, elemental mapping of metal oxide and any cationic dopants can show an aggregate of metal oxide nanoparticle, and Si and/or Al in the zeolite can be present in the metal oxide phase, with no zeolite crystal present in the background. Furthermore, STEM studies can indicate that the metal oxide phase is crystalline. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the incorporation of Si and Al into the metal oxide phase is by way of covalent and/or ionic bonds in the ZrO₂ crystal lattice. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that a metal oxide precursor first forms a coordination bond with the surface atoms of a zeolite (i.e., Si, Al, and/or P), which is facilitated by the use of a chelating agent, such as urea, in the reaction mixture. The formation of this coordination complex causes disruptions in the crystal structure near the surface. Therefore, a certain degree of deconstruction of the zeolite surface layer(s) occurs to release Si, Al, and/or P for incorporation into the metal oxide phase as it forms.

As used herein, “oxidative power” is defined as the temperature at which 50% of the CO is oxidized to CO₂ when a simulated exhaust stream including nitric oxide (600 ppm), ethylene (75 ppm C₂H₄), CO (300 ppm), oxygen (10%), carbon dioxide (5.6%), water (6%), and nitrogen (the balance of simulated exhaust stream), is exposed to a catalyst (e.g., a metal oxide catalyst) at a space velocity of 60,000 hr⁻¹ in a reverse light off study (starting at 600° C., to a temperature of 160° C.). As an example, a metal oxide with a relatively low oxidative power has a (T₅₀CO) of >600° C. (e.g., ZrO₂), while a metal oxide with relatively high oxidative power has a (T₅₀CO) of <500° C.

As used herein, “reductive power” refers to the ability to enhance the NO_(x) storage property to enhance NO_(x) conversion.

As used herein, “microporous” refers to material having pores of a maximum pore dimension of up to 2 nm, “mesoporous” refers to a material having pores of a maximum pore dimension of from 2 to 50 nm, and “macroporous” refers to a material having pores of a maximum pore dimension of greater than 50 nm.

As used herein, “significantly” or “substantially” refers to greater than 90% (e.g., greater than 95%, or greater than 98%).

As used herein, “about” refers to +5% (e.g., +3%) of a given value.

As used herein, a selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) catalyst is a catalyst that facilitates:

-   -   (i) Formation of NO₂ species in situ by the reaction of         NO+½O₂→NO₂, to serve as reactive intermediates from nitrogen         oxides in the exhaust stream, without significantly oxidizing         NH₃ into N₂O. For embodiments of the catalysts of the present         disclosure, even if NH₃ oxidation occurs, in some instances the         primary product is N₂, which is a desirable outcome.     -   (ii) Hydrocarbon oxidation at considerably lower temperatures,         for example, the oxidation of longer chain unsaturated         hydrocarbons such as propylene.

As used herein, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst is a catalyst that catalyzes the reduction of NO_(x) to nitrogen and water.

As used herein, a urea hydrolysis catalyst is a catalyst that hydrolyzes urea and isocyanic acid (HNCO) with minimal or zero formation of high molecular weight aromatic (HMAr) compounds such as cyanuric acid, ammilide, ammeline, and/or melamine.

As used herein, a DPF catalyst is a catalyst that captures soot particles and contains PGM for NO₂-make to facilitate soot lightoff at relatively low temperatures (e.g., <350° C.) for passive soot oxidation. The DPF can also serve as an ash storage device.

As used herein, a DOC is a catalyst that oxidizes gases and other volatile particulates from the engine exhaust, including hydrocarbons, CO and NO (which is oxidized to make NO₂, made possible by the relatively high PGM loading.

As used herein, an ammonia oxidation (AMOX) catalyst is a catalyst that includes a layer of PGM (such as a DOC), covered by a SCR catalyst layer, which is located after a SCR to carry out dual functions of (1) reducing NO_(x), and (2) scavenge excess NH₃ and selectively oxidize NH₃ to N₂, thus avoiding NH₃ slip.

As used herein, a 4-way catalyst is a catalyst that can serve the roles of a DOC, DPF catalyst, SCR catalyst, urea hydrolysis catalyst, and AMOX catalyst concurrently.

HBC Structure

As discussed above, in general, the HBCs include a primary catalyst that can be a highly porous particle and a secondary catalyst. The secondary catalyst is hybridized to the surfaces (e.g., the internal porous surface and/or the external surface) of the primary catalyst. In some embodiments, referring to FIG. 2, the primary catalyst 300 is a metal zeolite. The metal zeolite has a plurality of metal oxide secondary catalyst nanoparticles, which is a mixed crystal structure containing elements (e.g., Si and/or Al, or Si and Al) from the primary catalyst on the metal zeolite's inner and/or outer surface. The metal zeolite can have a large surface area provided by a variety of pores, such as micropores 310, mesopores 320, and macropores 330. The micropores have a maximum pore dimension of up to 2 nm. The mesopores have a maximum pore dimension of from 2 to 50 nm. The macropores have a maximum pore dimension of greater than 50 nm. In some embodiments, the macropores are the spaces between particles of primary catalyst 300.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the pores provide access for penetration of a secondary catalyst precursor into the primary catalyst, such that the secondary catalyst can form by incorporating structural elements at the surface of the primary catalyst and thereby crystallize in well-dispersed discrete locations within the primary catalyst. The higher surface area afforded by pores allows for decreased diffusion resistance and lower pressure difference for an exhaust gas that is to be treated by the HBC; resulting in greater fuel economy. A further advantage of secondary catalyst-containing primary catalyst is the sustained activity that can be afforded by the HBC under conditions where soot/ash covers the outer surfaces of a catalyst particle, which would otherwise poison the catalyst; however, with the HBCs of the present disclosure, the likelihood of poisoning is decreased because the soot/ash cannot access the inner surface of the primary catalyst, which is covered by a dispersion of a secondary catalyst. Thus, the combination of a well-dispersed secondary catalyst on a primary catalyst can be resistant to formation of soot and ash. The well-dispersed secondary catalyst also provides highly reactive catalytic sites that can operate in a synergistic manner with the primary catalyst. For example, the secondary catalyst (e.g., a metal oxide) can adsorb NO and rapidly convert the NO to NO₂, which reacts in the presence of NH₃ on an adjoining primary catalyst site (e.g., a metal zeolite) to produce N₂. Because the secondary catalyst is well dispersed, a large surface area of catalytically active sites can be provided, with enhanced catalytic activity.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the HBCs of the present disclosure have cation loading by the metal oxide phase of HBC is dependent on both the amount of metal oxide phase present, as well as the composition of the metal oxide phase. The cation loading capacity can play an important role in platinum group metal (PGM) binding to obtain highly distributed, high activity catalytic centers, which can translate into lower PGM loadings, reduced tendency for deactivation by sintering, and reduced overall cost.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the HBCs provide different types of active sites that are located in close proximity to one another within and/or on a HBC particle. For example, referring to FIG. 3, mesopores 400 can include primary catalyst active sites 410 in close proximity to hybridized secondary catalyst active sites 420. At the hybridized secondary catalyst active sites 420, the secondary catalyst is hybridized to the surface of the primary catalyst.

The different types of active sites can provide combined catalytic functionalities, faster reaction kinetics, synergy for high performance catalyst activity, and/or improved catalyst durability. In some embodiments, the different types of active sites can allow for rational catalyst design for SCR, DOC, or other catalysts in an EAS; and/or can allow for compact and lightweight EAS. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that faster reaction kinetics result from the increased number and close proximity of the catalyst active sites in HBCs, such that multiple catalytic reactions can occur in close proximity to one another both in time and space. For example, a SCR catalyst and a selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) catalyst can be spaced apart in the angstrom range in a HBC, which is closer in distance by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude compared to physically mixed particles of a SCR and SCO catalyst, as described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/935,199.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is also believed that improved catalyst durability can be achieved with a HBC due to combination of properties of the components of the HBC. For example, a highly oxidative secondary catalyst can be combined with a high temperature-tolerant primary catalyst in an appropriate ratio to achieve a HBC that has both high oxidative properties and temperature tolerance.

Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the primary and secondary catalysts can act in synergy with respect to one another when catalyzing the decomposition of exhaust gases, where the primary and secondary catalysts can both participate in a redox reaction as illustrated in FIG. 4, with one catalyst acting as a reducing agent (e.g., an anode) and the other catalyst acting as an oxidizing agent (e.g., a cathode). The redox reaction shown in FIG. 4 is a spontaneous and self-perpetuating process that occurs at adjacent active sites, where mass transfer limitations are minimal due to the close proximity of the active sites. The HBC components can be selected to possess ion exchange/binding properties to enable ion transport between sites both on the surface and in the bulk material. For example, doping of ZrO₂ with Y³⁺ cationic dopant creates lattice vacancies that permit O²⁻ transport through the bulk. On the other hand, dopants such as Ba²⁺ can create lattice vacancies (e.g., in BaZrO₃) that permit cation binding, and hence transport of cations (e.g., H₃O⁺) between reduction/oxidation sites in the bulk material.

In some embodiments, the HBCs of the present disclosure have a primary catalyst that includes one or more metal zeolites. In some embodiments, the metal zeolite is aluminosilicate zeolites and/or silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites. For example, the metal zeolite can be an aluminosilicate zeolite. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is a silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite. In some embodiments, the one or more metal zeolites further include a cation such as Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and/or Fe³⁺ in the zeolite active sites. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite also includes an alkali metal ion such as Na⁺ and K⁺ in the zeolite active sites to effectively neutralize (or cap) residual acid sites in the zeolite after doping with the desired catalytic metal ion. In certain embodiments, the one or more zeolite does not include any cations.

In some embodiments, the HBCs can include from 0.5 wt % (e.g., from 1 wt %, from 10 wt %, from 20 wt %, from 30 wt %, from 40 wt %, from 50 wt %, from 60 wt %, from 70 wt %, from 80 wt %, or from 90 wt %) to 99.5 wt % (e.g., to 90 wt %, to 80 wt %, to 70 wt %, to 60 wt %, to 50 wt %, to 40 wt %, to 30 wt %, to 20 wt %, to 10 wt %, or to 1 wt %) of the one or more metal zeolites. In certain embodiments, the HBCs can include from 10 wt % to 50 wt % (e.g., from 20 wt % to 40 wt %, from 30 wt % to 50 wt %, or about 30 wt %) of the one or more metal zeolites.

In some embodiments, the metal zeolite is a Fe-doped aluminosilicate zeolite, a Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolite, a Fe- and Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolite, a Fe-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite, a Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite, and/or a Fe and Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is a Fe-doped chabazite, a Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, and/or a Fe and Cu-doped chabazite. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is a Fe and/or Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite, and Fe- and/or Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolite in combination. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is ZSM-5 and/or β-zeolite. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is a chabazite. In certain embodiments, the metal zeolite is SSZ-13 or SAPO-34.

In some embodiments, the HBCs of the present disclosure have a secondary catalyst that includes one or more metal oxides. The metal oxides can be in the form of nanoparticles, having a maximum dimension of from 0.1 nm (e.g., from 1 nm, from 5 nm, from 10 nm, from 20 nm, from 30 nm, or from 40 nm) to 50 nm (e.g., to 40 nm, to 30 nm, to 20 nm, to 10 nm, to 5 nm, or to 1 nm). In certain embodiments, the metal oxides in the form of nanoparticles have a maximum dimension of from 1 nm to 5 nm (e.g., from 1 nm to 4 nm, from 2 nm to 5 nm, from 3 nm to 5 nm; about 3 nm). The secondary catalyst can be imaged via electron microscopy, and can be discrete nanoparticles located on the primary catalyst or within mesopores of the primary catalyst.

The one or more metal oxides of the secondary catalyst of the HBCs can include, for example, cerium oxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide, silicon oxide, hafnium oxide, vanadium oxide, niobium oxide, tantalum oxide, chromium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, ruthenium oxide, rhodium oxide, iridium oxide, nickel oxide, barium oxide, yttrium oxide, scandium oxide, calcium oxide, barium oxide, manganese oxide, lanthanum oxide, strontium oxide, cobalt oxide, copper oxide, iron oxide, and/or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the one or more metal oxides of the HBCs are zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, cerium oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, cobalt oxide, titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, barium oxide, and/or any combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the one or more metal oxides of the HBC include zirconia, ceria, vanadia, chromium oxide, barium oxide and niobium oxide.

In some embodiments, the one or more metal oxides of the secondary catalysts of the HBCs further include a cationic dopant. For example, the cationic dopant can include an oxide that includes Mg²⁺, Cu²⁺Cu+, Ni²⁺, Ti⁴⁺, V⁴⁺, Nb⁴⁺, Ta⁵⁺, Cr³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Mo³⁺, W⁶⁺, W³⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺, Zn²⁺, Ga³⁺, Al³⁺, In³⁺, Ge⁴⁺, Si⁴⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Ba²⁺, La³⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Nb⁵⁺, Sr²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, and/or Rh^(2+.) In certain embodiments, the cationic dopant is an oxide that includes Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, and/or Rh²⁺.

In certain embodiments, the one or more metal oxides of the secondary catalysts of the HBCs include a cation of one or more of the following elements: Ca, Sr, Ba, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, W, Ce, and/or P, which, with the exception of P, can be in the form of an oxide, and/or in the form of dopants in a metal oxide of the secondary catalyst. In some embodiments, when in the form of dopants, the dopant cations is achieved by incipient wetness impregnation and is bound by the anion exchange characteristics of the metal oxide, as described, for example, in Example 4, below. In some embodiments, one or more metal oxides of the secondary catalysts of the HBCs include a cation of one or more of Ba, Co, Zr, and/or P.

The HBCs of the present disclosure provide flexibility in their compositions. For example, the composition can be changed by adjusting an oxidative power to address the tradeoff between NO_(x) reduction performance and durability. In some embodiments, the optimal composition can be determined for each metal oxide system. The compositions presented herein illustrate the unique nature of this whole new class of catalyst material. In some embodiments, the one or more metal oxides of the secondary catalyst of the HBCs are CeO₂:ZrO₂ (i.e., a mixture of CeO₂ and ZrO₂ having, for example, from 40 wt % to 60 wt % CeO₂, Y₂O₃:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of Y₂O₃ and CeO₂, where, in some embodiments, has about 10 wt % of Y₂O₃), BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ca cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) (Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7) oxide) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Ba and Zr cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) (including higher oxidation states of cobalt oxide) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and Co cations of the composition, Zr oxides, and/or TiO₂:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of TiO₂ and CeO₂), each optionally including a cationic dopant that is an oxide that includes Ba²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Fe³⁺. In some embodiments, the metal oxide of the secondary catalyst in the HBCs is ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and V cations of the composition, Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Z, Ti, and V cations of the composition, Zr_(0.7)Ba_(0.3) oxide, and/or CeO₂:ZrO₂. In certain embodiments, while CeO₂ has higher oxidative power, ZrO₂ is selected instead as the secondary catalyst based upon both durability consideration and its ability to be modified by doping with strong oxidizing species (such as Mn₃O₄, CoO₃, V₂O₇, CrO₃, WO₂, MoO₂, NiO, Fe₃O₄, (HPO₄)²⁻, any combination thereof, and the like), in addition to modifiers such as BaO, which can enhance NO_(x) storage.

In some embodiments, the HBC do not include a cationic dopant. In some embodiments, the HBC consists of a metal oxide including a cationic dopant. In certain embodiments, the HBC consists of a metal oxide. In some embodiments, the one or more metal oxides do not include a cationic dopant. In some embodiments, the secondary catalyst consists of a metal oxide including a cationic dopant. In certain embodiments, the secondary catalyst consists of a metal oxide.

In some embodiments, the HBCs can have from 0.5 wt % (e.g., from 1 wt %, from 10 wt %, from 20 wt %, from 30 wt %, from 40 wt %, from 50 wt %, from 60 wt %, from 70 wt %, from 80 wt %, or from 90 wt %) to 99.5 wt % (e.g., to 90 wt %, to 80 wt %, to 70 wt %, to 60 wt %, to 50 wt %, to 40 wt %, to 30 wt %, to 20 wt %, to 10 wt %, or to 1 wt %) of the one or more metal oxide secondary catalysts.

The HBCs of the present disclosure can have a variety of desirable properties. For example, the HBCs can have a thermal resistance of up to 600° C. As used herein, “thermal resistance” refers to the ability of a catalyst to retain catalytic activity even with repeated exposure of up to 600° C. over extended periods of time (e.g., 100 hours).

The HBCs can offer combinations of desirable catalytic properties. For example, a SCR catalyst including Cu and/or Fe-doped zeolite-based HBCs having one crystalline metal oxide on an outer surface or within the zeolite mesopores can be additionally modified with a non-crystalline selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) catalyst by impregnation of an applied washcoat using an appropriate precursor solution (such as nickel sulfate heptahydrate), without the need to mix separate SCR and SCO particles. High SCR:SCO ratios can be achieved with equivalent or higher SCO surface area for enhanced NH₃ storage capacity with a lower mass of metal oxide, compared to that for a physical mixture of primary and secondary catalyst particles. The SCO phase can be tailored to obtain optimal oxidative power (e.g., with CrO₃) independently of storage capacity for reactants such as NH₃ or for NO_(x) (e.g., with BaO). In some embodiments, the HBCs of the present disclosure provides the ability to design and construct all major types of heavy duty diesel aftertreatment catalyst, such as a 4-way catalyst, described below.

The HBCs of the present disclosure can have tailored cold start and cold FTP cycle performance. As used herein, cold start conditions refer to the first 400 seconds after key-on as the temperature of the aftertreatment increases to achieve the optimal 350-450° C. range for NO_(x) reduction. As used herein, an “FTP cycle” refers to an EPA Federal Test Procedure, commonly known as FTP-75 for a city driving cycle. The HBCs can provide NO_(x) reduction catalyst compositions with effective performance in low or zero NO₂ conditions, such as when a close couple SCR is employed without a DOC upstream, or when a SCRF is used and soot oxidation reaction competes with the fast SCR reaction for the available NO₂. A DOC is used to produce sufficient NO₂ to optimally obtain a NO₂/NO_(x) ratio of unity. As NO₂/NO_(x) declines, so does the NO_(x) reduction efficiency, due to the critical role played by NO₂ in the “fast” SCR reaction (see reaction (3), above).

In some embodiments, the HBCs of the present disclosure have a BET surface area of at least 200 m²/g (e.g., at least 300 m²/g, at least 400 m²/g, or at least 500 m²/g). Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that HBC with a large BET surface area has greater catalytic activity compared to an HBC with a smaller BET surface area.

In some embodiments, the HBC has increased catalytic activity compared to a catalyst including metal oxide nanoparticles and a non-porous metal zeolite. As an example, a HBC including Cu-doped chabazite (CuSSZ-13) hybridized with nanocrystals of Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) (where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ba cations of the composition) has a T₅₀ of 240° C. for NO_(x) reduction efficiency with no NO₂ in the feed stream, which compares favorably with a reference 2013 commercial SCR control catalyst T₅₀ of 300° C. (see Example 2, infra). The 60° C. lower lightoff temperature for NO_(x) reduction for this HBC translates to the possibility of significant improvements over conventional SCR catalysts in cold start and cold FTP performance.

HBCs as Engine Aftertreatment Catalysts

The HBCs of the present disclosure are highly versatile and can be used, for example, as a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC), a diesel particulate filter (DPF) catalyst, a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst that can be used in a conventional SCR and/or in a SCRF configuration, a urea hydrolysis catalyst, and/or an ammonium oxidation (AMOX) catalyst.

As an example, a HBC-based DOC can have a zeolite primary catalyst of relatively high thermal resistance (e.g., small pore zeolites such as SSZ-13), while possessing good hydrocarbon (HC) and NO_(x) storage capacities. As used herein, “storage capacity” refers to the ability of a catalyst to adsorb amounts of the reactant species on the surface as a first step in the heterogeneous catalysis process. Therefore, it is understood by a person of ordinary skill in the art that good storage capacities (i.e., good adsorptive properties) are desirable for good reaction rates.

Storage capacities can be modified by exchanging cations (e.g., Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and/or Fe³⁺) into the active sites of the zeolite. The secondary catalyst in the HBC-based DOC can be a metal oxide that has relatively high oxidative power (e.g., CeO₂:ZrO₂, Y-doped CeO₂, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.8)Co_(0.2)O₄, CeO₂—Mn₃O₄, Ce/Co/Zr, and/or TiO₂—CeO₂), modified with cations that can enhance NO_(x) storage (e.g., Ba²⁺), as well as enhance NO_(x), CO, and HC oxidation compared to conventional Cu-zeolite-based SCR catalysts (e.g., Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and/or Fe³⁺).

In some embodiments, a HBC-based DOC includes a zeolite primary catalyst with a metal oxide secondary catalyst such as ZrV₂O₇; Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and V cations of the composition, and/or Ce_(0.6)Zr_(0.4), which can be further modified with Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and/or Ba²⁺. In some embodiments, complex oxides can have non-stoichiometric amounts of oxygen to lattice oxygen vacancies due to doping of the foreign cation into the lattice structure. Relatively large pore size zeolite primary catalysts (e.g., β-zeolite) are preferred due to their enhanced HC storage ability compared with small pore zeolites (e.g., chabazite).

The HBC-based DOC can be located upstream of the SCR. An important variant of a DOC is a partial oxidation catalyst (POC), which is a DOC-like catalyst applied to a particle filter that enables the oxidation of volatile organic compound (VOC) components of particulate matter in the exhaust gas while allowing larger particles to pass through to the DPF. The POC can serve the normal function of the DOC, and may preferentially be located upstream of a SCRF, to reduce as much as 50% of the soot reaching the SCRF; thus almost doubling the ash cleaning interval for a SCRF, which is otherwise considerably less when compared to a conventional DPF.

In some embodiments, DPF catalysts are constructed from HBCs as described above for the DOC. A conventional DPF is located downstream of the DOC and upstream of the SCR, and is made of a particle filter substrate with a Pt/Pd-based catalyst coating that can oxidize NO_(x) to generate NO₂; oxidize residual HC that can pass through the DOC; passively and/or actively oxidize soot in regenerating the DPF to form ash for storage; and provide a higher storage capacity, which results in a longer cleaning interval and a lower maintenance cost for the EAS. In some embodiments, as with DOC catalysts, the HBC-based DPF catalyst includes HBC catalysts having low or zero Pt/Pd content.

In some embodiments, an HBC-based SCR catalyst is composed of zeolites with relatively high thermal resistance (e.g., small micropores) zeolites such as SSZ-13 and SAPO-34), which has been doped with Cu²⁺ and/or Fe³⁺; with or without an alkali metal ions such as Na⁺ or K⁺, which can occupy residual Bronsted Lowry sites of the zeolite structure but serve no direct catalytic function. The secondary catalyst in the HBC-based SCR catalyst can be a metal oxide that has an oxidative power that can be tailored based upon the trade-off between NO_(x) reduction performance and durability, such as ZrO₂ or Y-doped ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, TiO₂/ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and V cations of the composition, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇ (e.g., Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ti, and V cations of the composition), Zr_(0.7)Ba_(0.3) oxide, and/or CeO₂:ZrO₂. The HBC-based SCR catalyst can be employed in a conventional SCR and/or in a SCRF configuration.

In certain embodiments, the HBC-based SCR catalyst includes a metal oxide secondary catalyst such as CeO₂:ZrO₂ (i.e., a mixture of CeO₂ and ZrO₂, such as from 40% to 60 wt % Ce in Zr), Ce_(0.6)Zr_(0.4)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ce cations of the composition, Y₂O₃:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of Y₂O₃ and CeO₂), BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ca cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba₀₅Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ba cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and Co cations of the composition (including higher oxidation states of cobalt oxide), Zr oxides and/or TiO₂:CeO₂, ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.5)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and V cations of the composition, and/or TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇ (e.g., Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ti, and V cations of the composition).

In some embodiments, referring to FIG. 1A, the HBC-based SCR catalyst can be used in a diesel particulate filter in a SCR system 104, such as a wall-flow filter, and particularly the monolithic core of the wall-flow filter. In some embodiments, the HBC-based SCR catalyst can lead to more compact exhaust aftertreatment systems. For example, referring to FIG. 1B, an exhaust aftertreatment system 124 includes a diesel oxidation catalytic system 196 upstream of a diesel exhaust fluid doser 202. A selective catalytic reduction on-filter (SCRF) 200 is downstream of the diesel exhaust fluid doser 202, and SCRF 200 is followed by a selective catalytic reduction system 204. The SCRF includes a diesel particulate filter (DPF) with a catalytic substrate having an HBC-based SCR catalyst coated thereon, thereby providing a compact SCRF that combines the functions of both a DPF and a selective catalytic reduction system. In some embodiments, referring to FIG. 1C, an exhaust aftertreatment system 224 includes a combined diesel oxidation catalytic system (“DOC”) and a diesel particulate filter 296 upstream of a diesel exhaust fluid doser 302. Downstream of the diesel exhaust fluid doser 302 is SCRF 300, which includes a DPF with a catalytic core having an HBC-based SCR catalyst loaded thereon. Exhaust aftertreatment system 224 has a DPF both upstream and downstream of the mixer and therefore increases the filter capacity. As shown in FIG. 1C, exhaust aftertreatment system 224 is more compact than the exhaust aftertreatment system 124 shown in FIG. 1B.

In certain embodiments, a “close-coupled SCR” with DEF doser may be located as close to the engine as possible, to obtain optimal reaction temperature despite reduced exhaust temperatures due to the use of an EGR. Examples of close-coupled SCR configurations are shown in FIGS. 1D and 1E. These close-coupled SCR configurations employ dual DEF dosers, with a DEF doser upstream of each SCR in the EAS, forming a more complex system configuration compared to current EASs, which generally have one DEF doser. EAS including a close-coupled HBC-based POC upstream of a SCRF is shown in FIG. 1F.

In some embodiments, a HBC-based AMOX catalyst can replace conventional catalyst compositions, which typically include a Pt/Pd catalyst washcoat on a flow through substrate, covered by a second Cu or Fe zeolite SCR washcoat catalyst layer. The AMOX catalyst is configured to utilize ammonia slip from SCR for NO_(x) reduction, while decreasing the likelihood of NH₃ slip into the environment. Preferred embodiment of the HBC-based AMOX catalyst include, for example, a Cu and/or Fe-doped zeolite primary catalyst with one or more metal oxide secondary catalysts including CeO₂:ZrO₂ (i.e., a mixture of CeO₂ and ZrO₂, preferably between 40 wt % to 60 wt % Ce, Y₂O₃:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of Y₂O₃ and CeO₂), BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O₂, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.2)Mn_(0.3)O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr and Ba cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) (including higher oxidation states of cobalt oxide, where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr, Ba, and Co cations of the composition), Zr oxides and/or TiO₂:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of TiO₂ and CeO₂), ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and V cations of the composition, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ti, and V cations of the composition, and/or Ce_(0.6)Zr_(0.4)O₄. The HBC-based AMOX catalyst can be further modified with Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and/or Ba²⁺.

In certain embodiments, the HBC-based AMOX catalyst includes a first catalyst layer that includes a metal zeolite primary catalyst having mesopores and metal oxide secondary catalyst crystalline nanoparticles hybridized to the surface of the metal zeolite. The metal zeolite primary catalyst can include an aluminosilicate zeolite and/or a silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite. The aluminosilicate zeolite or silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite can includes a cation such as Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and/or Fe³⁺, and wherein the aluminosilicate zeolite or silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite optionally includes an alkali metal ion selected from Na⁺ and K⁺. The metal oxide secondary catalyst can include CeO₂:ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:CeO₂, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, CeO₂—Mn₃O₄, Ce/Co/Zr oxides, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of 0 that counterbalances the Zr and Ca cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr and Ba cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) (including higher oxidation states of cobalt oxide) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and Co cations of the composition, Zr oxides and/or TiO₂:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of TiO₂ and CeO₂), ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O₄₋₇, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ti, and V cations of the composition, and/or Ce_(0.6)Zr_(0.4)O₄. The HBC-based AMOX catalyst can be further modified with Ba²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and/or Fe³⁺.

The HBC-based ammonium oxidation catalyst can also include a second catalyst layer including a metal zeolite and metal oxide nanoparticles hybridized to the surface. The metal zeolite can include an aluminosilicate zeolite and a silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite. The aluminosilicate zeolite or silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite includes a cation selected from Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Fe³⁺, and wherein the aluminosilicate zeolite or silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite optionally includes an alkali metal ion selected from Na⁺ and K⁺. The metal oxide nanocrystalline particle is ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_((1-x))Ba_(x) oxide (where x is between 3 and 4), BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, CeO₂—Mn₃O₄, Ce/Co/Zr oxides, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O₂, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Ba and Zr cations of the composition, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) (including higher oxidation states of cobalt oxide) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ba, and Co cations of the composition, Zr oxides and/or TiO₂:CeO₂ (i.e., a mixture of TiO₂ and CeO₂), ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O₃-7, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.7)Ti_(0.3)VO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances the Zr, Ti, and V cations of the composition, CeO₂:ZrO₂, and/or Ce_(0.6)Zr_(0.4)O₄.

In some embodiments, a HBC-based urea hydrolysis catalyst has the same composition as a HBC-based SCR catalyst, or has a dramatically reversed ratio of zeolite-to-metal oxide (i.e., with the metal oxide secondary catalyst as the majority species in the HBC). In some embodiments, the HBC includes metal oxide nanoparticles and a metal zeolite. The metal zeolite has metal oxide nanoparticles hybridized on the available surfaces.

In certain embodiments, the HBC-based urea hydrolysis catalyst is applied to the surface of an impact static mixer and has a NO_(x) conversion efficiency of at least 10%.

Hydrolysis Catalyst Washcoat Procedure:

A washcoat slurry including the following can be used to coat a metallic mixer device, which can first be surface roughened by abrasion, degreased with isopropanol and washed with deionized water: HBC (Type B, see below), deionized water; optionally lactic acid; poly(ethylene glycol-ran-propylene glycol) (e.g., having a molecular weight M_(n) of about 2,500); poly(ethylene oxide) (e.g., having a molecular weight M_(v) of about 300,000). Following mixing or milling (such as milling using a roller mill apparatus), the washcoat slurry can be cooled to room temperature and applied to a substrate, such as a metallic mixer. After drying for a period of 8-12 hours in air, the coated mixer can be dried in an air oven at about 100-120° C. A second coating can be optionally applied and the coated mixer can be calcined (e.g., for 1 hr at about 450-650° C.). Relative durability of the coating can be determined by weighing before and after applying a blast of N₂ at 70 psig.

In some embodiments, a washcoat slurry including the following can be used to coat a metallic mixer device, which has been surface roughened by abrasion, degreased with isopropanol and washed with deionized water: 3.5 g HBC (Type-B) based upon CuZSM-5 zeolite with 35% hybridized ZrO₂; 12 g deionized water; 0.3 g lactic acid; 0.3 g poly(ethylene glycol-ran-propylene glycol) Mn ˜2,500; 0.3 g poly(ethylene oxide) Mv 300,000 (all reagents obtained from Sigma-Aldrich). Following extensive mixing in a roller mill apparatus, the slurry was cooled to room temperature and applied to the metallic mixer. After drying for a period of 8-12 hours in air, the coated mixer was dried at 105° C. in an air oven. A second coating was then applied. The washcoat was calcined for 1 hr at 450° C. Relative durability of the coating was determined by weighing before and after applying a blast of N2 at 70 psig.

In some embodiments, the DEF is sprayed onto the coated mixer at a temperature of 150° C. to 500° C. for the NO_(x) reduction of diesel engine exhaust. It is believed that the primary function of the urea hydrolysis catalyst is the hydrolytic breakdown of urea, HNCO and other urea byproducts as rapidly as possible to facilitate NH₃ production; and that NO_(x) reduction is a secondary function that can contribute to addressing overall NO_(x) reduction of the EAS. In some embodiments, the urea hydrolysis catalyst can bind and oxidize SCR catalyst poisons, such as hydrocarbons, sulfur, phosphorus, or a combination thereof. In some embodiments, the urea hydrolysis catalyst can be regenerated. In some embodiments, the urea hydrolysis catalyst is a sacrificial catalyst that can irreversibly bind SCR catalyst poisons.

4-Way Catalyst

In some embodiments, a given HBC of the present disclosure replaces the DOC, DPF catalyst, SCR catalyst, optionally used urea hydrolysis catalyst, and AMOX catalyst that are located in separate compartments in an EAS. Instead, referring to FIG. 5, the HBCs of the present disclosure can be located in a single compartment 500 and perform the functions of the DOC, DPF, SCR, optionally used urea hydrolysis catalyst, and AMOX concurrently, as a 4-way catalyst. A 4-way catalyst is defined as a single catalyst packaging based upon an HBC, with the capability of addressing the four main functions of an EAS: i.e., the functions of the DOC, DPF, SCR, and AMOX catalysts. In some embodiments, the 4-way catalyst also performs the functions of the urea hydrolysis catalyst. The advantages associated with the 4-way catalyst include, for example, the 4-way catalyst can provide compact, lightweight and relatively low cost EAS; can streamline product offering for a global market; can lower manufacturing cost; and can lower cost of ownership for the customer.

In some embodiments, the EAS has one catalyst, a 4-way catalyst, which is based upon the HBC platform technology, with specific regions of the 4-way catalyst modified to emphasize the specific functionalities: DOC or POC, SCR on DPF filter (SCRF) with a hydrolysis catalyst coated DEF mixer, and optionally SCR with an AMOX, as required. The precise dimensions and relative proportions of the different functionalities in the 4-way catalyst can be tailored to the specific engine exhaust conditions (e.g., engine out NO_(x) levels).

In some embodiments, the HBC-based 4-way catalyst is copper-doped chabazite containing zirconium vanadate and doped with Pt²⁺ and Pd²⁺; copper-doped β-zeolite containing barium vanadate and doped with Co²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Rh²⁺; copper-doped ZSM-5 barium zirconate and doped with Co²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Ru²⁺; copper-doped chabazite containing ceria zirconia and doped with Pt²⁺ and Pd²⁺; and/or copper-doped chabazite containing zirconium barium phosphate and doped with Ni²⁺. In some embodiments, the HBC-based 4-way catalyst is copper-doped chabazite containing zirconium vanadate and doped with Pt²⁺ and Pd²⁺; copper-doped β-zeolite containing barium vanadate and doped with Co²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Rh²⁺; copper-doped ZSM-5 barium zirconate and doped with Co²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Ru²⁺, copper-doped chabazite containing ceria zirconia and doped with Pt²⁺ and Pd²⁺; and/or copper-doped chabazite containing zirconium barium phosphate and doped with Ni²⁺.

As an example, a representative 4-way catalyst composition for heavy duty truck application is as follows:

-   -   (i) POC composed of HBC (Type-A), based upon Cup-zeolite         hybridized with 10% Zr_((0.8))Co_((0.19))Ba_((0.01)), and         applied to a 50% particle retention metallic filter substrate.         After calcining, the washcoat is impregnated with Pd (0.1         g/L):Rh (0.5 g/L) catalyst;     -   (ii) Hydrolysis catalyst composition: HBC (Type-B) based upon         Cup-zeolite with 35% hybridized ZrO₂, coated onto a metallic         static mixer that is equipped for electrical heating;     -   (iii) SCRF with a HBC (Type-A) composition of Cu (0.6 wt         %)-chabazite/3% Zr_((0.6))Ba_((0.2))Co_((0.2)) applied to a high         porosity (65%) silicon carbide DPF filter with ≥90% particle         retention;     -   (iv) Optionally Cu (0.6 wt %)-Chabazite/3%         Zr_((0.6))Ba_((0.2))Co_((0.2)) SCR HBC (Type—A) catalyst can be         applied to a flow-through substrate to serve as an extra NO_(x)         reduction step under very high engine-out NO_(x) (e.g., ≥4         g/kW-hr) conditions;     -   (v) The AMOX can be either in a small portion of a flow-through         substrate (downstream of a SCRF), or in a zone coated downstream         portion of a SCR (as described in (iv) above). The catalyst in         each of the two possibilities includes two distinct layers: a         lower layer of HBC catalyst as described in (i) above; and an         upper layer of Cu-chabazite.

In some embodiments, the 4-way catalyst includes CuHBC—SSZ13-ZV/≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd], CuHBC-β-ZB(AP)/≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd], and/or CuHBC-β-ZBCo(AP)≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] in a DOC (POC) zone; with a urea reductant; CuHBC—SSZ13-ZrO2(AP) in a urea hydrolysis zone; CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB(AP), CuHBC—SSZ13-ZBCo(AP), and/or a blend of CuSSZ-13/CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB(AP) in a SCR on DPF zone; and CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB(AP) in a SCR/AMOX zone.

In some embodiments, the 4-way catalyst includes CuHBC—SSZ13-ZV/≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd], CuHBC-β-ZB(AP)/≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd], and/or CuHBC-β-ZBCo(AP)≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] in a DOC (POC) zone; with a hydrogen reductant; CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB(AP), CuHBC—SSZ13-ZBCo(AP)≥0.01 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd], CuHBC—SSZ13-ZBCo(AP)≥0.01 g/L Pd, and/or CuHBC—SSZ13-ZBCoP(AP)≥0.01 g/L Ni in a SCR on DPF zone.

Hybrid Binary Catalyst Preparation

The HBCs of the present disclosure can be synthesized using two different methods, Type-A and Type-B, as outlined below.

Type-A—hybridization between zeolite and metal oxide, followed by copper exchange of the hybrid zeolite/metal oxide material to allow copper to be loaded on both the zeolite and the metal oxide components of the hybridized material.

Type-B—copper exchange of the zeolite (only) provides Cu-zeolite crystals, followed by hybridization to covalently link precursor molecules that transform into metal oxide nanoparticles on the surfaces of Cu-zeolite crystals.

Two hybridization procedures can be employed under the Type-A HBC synthesis method, using metal oxide precursors:

Procedure A—metal oxide precursors were dissolved in acidic aqueous solution, and the resulting mixture was vigorously stirred to obtain slurry containing zeolite particles. The metal oxide precursors were then reacted with the zeolite by neutralizing at elevated temperature (typically with 65° C.), with dropwise addition of ammonium hydroxide solution.

Procedure B—two separate aqueous solutions of reactive precursor were prepared. The first solution contained the zirconium precursor (and potentially other precursors in acid solution), along with the zeolite powder. Upon adding the second solution to the slurry, the hybridization reaction occurred instantaneously.

Procedure A: Co-Precipitation of Precursors from Acid Solution

In general, procedure A includes mixing metal oxide precursor reagents in the appropriate stoichiometric proportions in deionized (“DI”) water with urea (a chelating agent) to facilitate nucleation of the precipitating metal oxide(s) at active centers (e.g., Al, Si and P species) on the zeolite crystal surfaces. Examples of precursor reagents include zirconyl chloride octahydrate, ammonium cerium nitrate, potassium permanganate, cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, chromium nitrate, nickel nitrate, potassium permanganate, titanium chloride, tungsten chloride. The selected zeolite can be added to the clear solution in the powder form, with vigorous stirring to obtain a thoroughly mixed slurry. Optionally, random copolymer poly(ethyleneglycol-ran-polypropyleneglycol) (i.e., PEO-PPO) can be added to obtain optimal uniformity of nanoparticles size and distribution. Heat can be applied (e.g., to about 65° C.) to the slurry and a NH₄OH aqueous solution can be added. The endpoint of the site-directed hybridization reaction can be established when the sol-gel point has been surpassed, which is marked by a dramatic increase in viscosity. Vigorous stirring and continuous heating can allow the high viscosity to decrease, and additional NH₄OH can be added to ensure that all of the available precursors or reactive moieties have been covalently bonded to the zeolite surfaces. Where cobalt precursor is employed, the endpoint is accompanied by a very distinctive color change from bright pink to “cobalt blue”. The lack of color in the filtrate and bright cobalt blue color of the retrieved product can be used as a clear indication that most (or all) of the Co²⁺ precursor has been preferentially hybridized to the zeolite surface.

The entire mixture can be either briefly quenched in an ice-bath or filtered while hot. Washing should be conducted with generous quantities of deionized water. The solids should be washed, air dried, oven dried at between 105° C.-120° C. (e.g., for 1 hr), and then calcined at 600° C. (e.g., for 1 hr).

Procedure B: Incipient Co-Reactive Precursor Precipitation

In general, for procedure B, two separate aqueous solutions of reactive precursor are prepared. A first solution contains zirconium and other precursors that only react when neutralized with NH₄OH, along with the zeolite powder to form a slurry. The second solution contained a metal oxide precursor, such as ortho phosphoric acid, sodium vanadate, titanium chloride, and/or ammonium molybdate. When the second solution is added to the first solution, the metal oxide precursors in the second solution reacted instantly with the zirconium precursor(s) in the first solution; at room temperature or cooled to below room temperature (e.g., to −15° C.) to regulate the kinetics of the hybridization reaction to form metal oxide nanoparticles on the zeolite surface. The final NH₄OH neutralization step ensures complete hybridization of the precursors to the zeolite surface.

Copper sulfate solution in DI water can be used to treat protonated zeolite, with or without concentrated sulfuric acid adjustment to pH 3. The mixture can be heated at 80° C. for 1-3 hrs, with constant stirring. The copper-exchanged product should be filtered, washed with generous amounts of DI water, air dried, oven dried at between 105° C.-120° C. (e.g., for 1 hr), then calcined at 550° C. (e.g., for 1 hr).

In some embodiments, to make Type-B HBC, copper sulfate solution is first incubated with zeolite at 80° C. for 3 hours with vigorous stirring, and processed as described previously for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts to provide Cu-Zeolite powder, then the Cu-Zeolite powder and metal oxide precursors can be reacted as described in the copper exchange procedure for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts to achieve hybridization. The obtained product can be further treated as described above for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts.

In some embodiments, the HBCs of the present disclosure are made by providing an aqueous solution including a chelating agent (e.g., urea) and a metal oxide precursor such as ZrOCl₂.8H₂O, NaVO₃, BaCl₂, (NH₄)₆Ce^(IV)NO₃)₄, KMnO₄, Co(NO₃)₂ (e.g., cobalt nitrate hexahydrate), Cr(NO₃)₃, CaCl₂, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, nickel nitrate, titanium chloride, tungsten chloride; mixing the aqueous solution including the chelating agent and the metal oxide precursor with a zeolite catalyst to provide a metal oxide precursor-coated zeolite; and calcining the metal oxide precursor-coated metal zeolite to provide the HBC. The HBC include metal oxide nanoparticles bound to the metal zeolite.

While synthetic and naturally occurring zeolites can be employed in the synthesis of a metal oxide-coated zeolite, mesoporous zeolites are especially advantageous as they can provide sustained reactivity and enhanced catalytic properties, as previously discussed.

The HBCs can be used and synthesized as catalyst washcoat compositions. In washcoat compositions, the HBCs can have a primary zeolite catalyst having a maximum particle dimension of less than 1,000 nm. When the primary zeolite catalyst is a mesoporous particle, very high internal surfaces areas (e.g., up to about 700 m²/g) are accessible to reactant species for synthesizing the metal oxide secondary catalyst directly on the internal and/or external surfaces to form a HBC in situ. By utilizing aqueous chemistry, the fully expanded and open pore structure of the highly hydrophilic zeolite can be accessed by the secondary catalyst precursors throughout the hybridization reaction.

Analysis of the HBCs can be carried out using a variety of techniques, such as inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy, which provides accurate elemental compositions; X-Ray diffraction, which provides information on the structural properties (e.g., crystallinity) that relates to both composition and durability; BET surface area analysis, which provides both available surface area for catalyst reaction and porosity information, which in turn correlates to access of reactants to the activity sites; synthetic gas bench (SGB) performance testing provides emissions control testing information when the catalyst is applied to a monolith substrate in the form of a washcoat, and where conditions simulating on-engine test conditions are employed in this test so that realistic conclusions related to diesel emissions control can be drawn from the results; electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), which complements ICP by conducting elemental analysis in situ, without having to digest the sample in concentrated acid; scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) provide in situ microstructural and elemental analysis, depicting the catalyst in its actual functional state; and/or thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, which in combination permit analysis of urea thermolysis kinetics.

Method of Using the HBCs

In some embodiments, the HBCs are used for reducing NO_(x) in diesel engine exhaust in a selective catalytic reduction system. During use, an HBC of the present disclosure is exposed to a NO_(x)-containing diesel engine exhaust, where the HBC is disposed on or within a catalyst support structure. In some embodiments, the catalyst support structure is a ceramic monolith and/or a metallic substrate.

In some embodiments, the HBC is capable of decomposing urea deposits. The HBC can increase NO_(x) reduction under cold start conditions, where a close coupled SCR is heated to greater than 200° C. within 400 seconds and functions without a DOC upstream.

In some embodiments, the HBC assists in making NO₂ in situ without significantly oxidizing NH₃ (i.e., by selective catalytic oxidation), while also catalyzing the reduction of NO_(x) (i.e., by selective catalytic reduction), such that the HBC simultaneously exhibits selective catalytic oxidation and selective catalytic reduction properties. The HBC can be provided in an internal surface areas of the wall-flow filter in a manner such that the distribution or loading of the catalyst is generally symmetrical across the wall. The catalyst can increase the thermal resistance of its individual components, such that the components can synergistically interact to provide a more robust catalyst composition.

Examples

Nomenclature

Zeolites

-   -   SSZ-13, or SSZ13: Chabazite     -   SAPO-34     -   ZSM-5     -   β: beta zeolite         Metal Oxides     -   Z: Zirconium dioxide (ZrO2)     -   ZB: Barium zirconate     -   ZV: Zirconium vanadate (or related compounds)     -   ZP: Zirconium phosphate; or oxides of phosphorus, which serves         as a dopant for ZrO₂     -   B: Barium oxide     -   Co: Cobalt (oxide)     -   Mn: Manganese (oxide)     -   CZ: Ceria-zirconia (also shown as ZCe)     -   Cr: Chromium (oxide)     -   Ca: Calcium     -   AP: “A” refers to the relative amount of metal oxide         precursor(s) employed (see for example Table 5), and “P”         indicates the use of random copolymer         poly(ethyleneglycol-ran-polypropyleneglycol) (i.e., PEO-PPO)]

The following examples are provided to illustrate, not limit, the disclosure.

Example 1 describes the synthesis and characterization of the HBCs of the present disclosure. Example 2 describes the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) performance of exemplary HBCs. Example 3 describes diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) properties of HBCs. Example 4 describes Urea Hydrolysis Catalyst Properties of Hybrid Binary Catalysts. Example 5 describes embodiments of 4-way catalyst compositions.

EXAMPLES Example 1. Hybrid Binary Catalyst Synthesis

The Examples below describe two types of hybrid binary catalysts (HBCs):

Type-A—hybridization between zeolite and metal oxide, followed by copper exchange of the hybrid zeolite/metal oxide material to allow copper to be loaded on both the zeolite and the metal oxide components of the hybridized material.

Type-B—copper exchange of the zeolite (only) provides Cu-zeolite crystals, followed by hybridization to covalently link nanoparticles of metal oxides to the surfaces of Cu-zeolite crystals.

Type-A Hybrid Binary Catalyst Synthesis

Step 1: Zeolite/Metal Oxide Hybridization

There are two hybridization procedures employed, using metal oxide precursors:

Procedure A—metal oxide precursors were dissolved in acidic aqueous solution, and the resulting mixture was vigorously stirred to obtain a slurry containing zeolite particles. The metal oxide precursors were then reacted with the zeolite by neutralizing at elevated temperature (typically with 65° C.), with dropwise addition of ammonium hydroxide solution.

Procedure B—two separate aqueous solutions of reactive precursor were prepared. The first solution contained the zirconium precursor (and potentially other precursors in acid solution), along with the zeolite powder. Upon adding the second solution to the slurry, the hybridization reaction occurred instantaneously.

Procedure A: Co-Precipitation of Precursors from Acid Solution

The following zeolites were used: nano-ZSM-5 zeolite (ACS), beta-zeolite (Tosoh USA), as well as custom synthesized SAPO-34, and SSZ-13.

Metal oxide precursor reagents in the appropriate stoichiometric proportions were mixed in deionized (“DI”) water with urea (a chelating agent) to facilitate nucleation of the precipitating metal oxide(s) at active centers (e.g., Al, Si and P species) on the zeolite crystal surfaces. Examples of precursor reagents include zirconyl chloride octahydrate, ammonium cerium nitrate, potassium permanganate, cobalt nitrate hexahydrate, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, chromium nitrate, nickel nitrate, potassium permanganate, titanium chloride, tungsten chloride. This reagent mixture was a clear solution at room temperature. The selected zeolite was added to the clear solution in the powder form, with vigorous stirring to obtain a thoroughly mixed slurry. Optionally, random copolymer poly(ethyleneglycol-ran-polypropyleneglycol) (i.e., PEO-PPO) may be added to serve as a surfactant to obtain optimal uniformity of nanoparticles size and distribution. Heat was applied to the slurry and 28% NH₄OH solution was added dropwise (1 drop/sec), when 65° C. was attained. The endpoint was established when the sol-gel point was surpassed, which was marked by a dramatic increase in viscosity. Vigorous stirring and continuous heating enabled the high viscosity to decrease, and additional NH₄OH was added to ensure that all of the available precursors or reactive moieties were hybridized to the zeolite surfaces. Where cobalt precursor was employed, the endpoint was accompanied by a very distinctive color change from bright pink to “cobalt blue”. The lack of color in the filtrate and bright cobalt blue color of the retrieved product was a clear indication that the Co²⁺ precursor (and other reacting precursors) was almost completely hydrolyzed to the zeolite surface.

The entire mixture was either briefly quenched in an ice-bath or filtered while hot. Washing was conducted with generous quantities of deionized water. The solids were washed, air dried, oven dried at between 105° C.-120° C. (1 hr), and then calcined at 600° C. (1 hr).

Procedure B: Incipient Co-Reactive Precursor Precipitation Step 1: Hybridization of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Zeolite

Two separate aqueous solutions of reactive precursor were prepared. A first solution contained the zirconium and other precursors that only react when neutralized with NH₄OH, along with the zeolite powder to form a slurry. The second solution contained a metal oxide precursor, such as ortho phosphoric acid, sodium vanadate, titanium chloride, and/or ammonium molybdate. When the second solution is added to the first solution, the metal oxide precursors in the second solution reacted instantly with the zirconium precursor(s) in the first solution; at room temperature or cooled to (−15° C.) to regulate the kinetics of the hybridization reaction to form metal oxide nanoparticles on the zeolite surface.

Step 2: Copper Exchange Procedure

Copper sulfate solution was prepared in DI water at various concentrations (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, or 1.0M) and used to treat protonated zeolite in a proportion of 500 mL copper sulfate solution to 100 g of zeolite. 0.1M copper sulfate solution was used with and without concentrated sulfuric acid adjustment to pH 3. The mixture was heated at 80° C. for either 1 hr or 3 hr, with constant stirring. The copper-exchanged product was filtered, washed with generous amounts of DI water, air dried, oven dried at between 105° C.-120° C. (1 hr), then calcined at 550° C. (1 hr).

Type-B Hybrid Binary Catalyst

Step 1: Copper Exchange Procedure

1M copper sulfate solution was incubated with zeolite at 80° C. for 3 hours with vigorous stirring, and processed as described previously for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts.

Step 2: Hybridization of Zeolite and Metal Oxide

Cu-Zeolite powder from Step 1 and metal oxide precursors were reacted as described in the copper exchange procedure for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts to achieve hybridization. The obtained product was further treated as described above for Type-A hybrid binary catalysts.

Characterization of Hybrid Binary Catalyst Materials

The following characterization techniques were used to study the HBCs synthesized above.

(a) Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Spectroscopy, which provides accurate elemental compositions.

(b) X-Ray Diffraction, which provides information on the structural properties (e.g., crystallinity) that relates to both composition and durability.

(c) BET Surface Area Analysis, which provides both available surface area for catalyst reaction and porosity information, which in turn correlates to access of reactants to the activity sites.

(d) Synthetic Gas Bench (SGB) performance testing provides emissions control testing information when the catalyst is applied to a (1″×3″) monolith substrate in the form of a washcoat. Conditions simulating on-engine test conditions are employed in this test so that realistic conclusions related to diesel emissions control can be drawn from the results.

(e) Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), which complements ICP by conducting elemental analysis in situ, without having to digest the sample in concentrated acid.

(f) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) provide in situ microstructural and elemental analysis, depicting the catalyst in its actual functional state.

(g) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy permit analysis of urea thermolysis kinetics, and the potential impact of Type-B Hybrid Binary Catalyst compositions.

Results

A summary of the copper loading results achieved with four different zeolites and their zirconium/barium Type-A HBC derivatives, using 1M CuSO₄ at 80° C. for 3 hrs are shown in Table 2. These zeolites represent the very broad range of zeolite types (including pore sizes). The cation (e.g., copper) loading ratio (CLR) for each zeolite type is defined as wt % Cu²⁺ in Cu-Zeolite/wt % copper in HBC.

CLR for the four zeolites presented in Table 2A are ranked in the order: β-Zeolite≥SAPO-34>SSZ-13>ZSM-5, which is inversely related to the total barium-doped zirconia metal oxide loading for the given zeolite.

The relatively high CLR value for β-Zeolite provides evidence that the cation exchange capacity power of the barium-doped zirconia metal oxide phase at about 3% of the HBC content, does not facilitate additional copper loading beyond that of the zeolite phase to the extent that was expected based on the ion exchange capacity for the metal oxide only (see Table 2B). On the other end of the spectrum, a relatively low CLR value for ZSM-5 correspond to the highest metal oxide loading of about 5.5% content of the HBC. This data, in combination with that in Table 2B, suggest that the copper loading by the metal oxide phase of HBC is dependent on both the amount of metal oxide phase present, as well as the composition of the metal oxide phase. Furthermore, the cation loading capacity can play an important role in platinum group metal (PGM) binding to obtain highly distributed, high activity catalytic centers, which can translate into lower PGM loadings, reduced tendency for deactivation by sintering, and reduced overall cost.

The relatively large pore zeolites (such as β-zeolite and ZSM-5) are desirable for HBC use in DOC applications, due to their ability to store relatively large quantities of hydrocarbons.

FIG. 2A Cation (Cu²⁺) Loading Ratio for Different Zeolites in Type-A HBC Based on Zr and Ba. Cation ZrO₂-based Mixed Zeolite Zeolite (Cu²⁺) Metal Oxide Item Catalyst Composition Pore Copper Loading (wt % ± 10) # ID Al Si P Size Loading Ratio Zr Ba 1 ZSM-5 2.2 37.3   5Å 2 CuZSM5 #1 2.4 34.8   5Å 0.2 3 CuZSM5 #2 2.6 38.3   5Å 0.2 0.13 4 CuHBC- 2.1 35.6   5Å 1.5 3.2 2.5 ZSM5-ZB 5 βZeolite 2.2 37.5 5.5-7Å 6 Cuβ 2.8 37.5 5.5-7Å 2.3 7 CuHBC- 2.4 35.5 5.5-7Å 2 1 2.8 2 β-ZB(A) 8 CuHBC- 2.5 36.1 5.5-7Å 1.9 2.7 1.7 β-ZB(AP) 9 SSZ-13 2.6 36.6 3.8Å 10 CuSSZ-13 2.7 40.6 3.8Å 1.2 0.41 11 CuHBC- 2.4 36.7 3.8Å 2.9 3.3 1.4 SSZ13--ZB 12 SAPO-34 17.2 3 17.2 3.8Å 13 CuSAPO-34 20.2 4.2 18.2 3.8Å 1.8 0.72 14 CuHBC- 18.1 3.3 16.2 3.8Å 2.5 3.9 0.6 SAP034-ZB In Table 2A, the cation loading ratio (CLR) is CuZeolite/Hybrid Binary Catalyst. The CLR ranking is β-Zeolite>[SAPO-34]>Chabazite>ZSM-5

TABLE 2B Copper Loading for Metal Oxides Under Equivalent Conditions Used for HPC Preparation (Note that solubilization of cerium was incomplete in ICP procedure) Composition (wt%) Item Metal Cu # Oxide Zr Ba Co V Ca Ce P Loading 1 CuZ 57.8 0.3 2 CuZB 41.5 19 2.2 3 CuZBCo 51.6 0.2 11.6 1.6 5 CuZBCoP 17.9 26.7 1.7 8.9 8.2 5 CuZV 34.2 26.8 1.7 6 CuZVCa 11.8 47.3 0.6 0.8 7 CuZCe 46.4 6.9 0.2 (+)

Additional data describing the physical properties of the catalyst compositions shown on line item 5-8 in Table 2A (for β-zeolite), are presented in Table 2C.

TABLE 2C Effect of PEO/PPO on BET Surface Area and Porosity for β-Zeolite Based HBC (See also FIGS. 6A and 6B) BET HK Item # Surface Median HK Maximum from Area Pore Width Pore Volume Table 2A Catalyst ID (m²/g) (Å) (cm³/g) 5 β-Zeolite 618 6.47 0.2436 6 Cuβ 642 5.71 0.2496 7 CuHBC-β-ZB(A) 595 6.62 0.2345 8 CuHBC-β-ZB(AP) 803 7.83 0.3274

The BET data presented in Table 2C depicts the very dramatic increase in both surface area and porosity that can be achieved when PEO/PPO is employed in the hybridization process (item 8, Table 2A). This unique, high surface area and high porosity catalyst structure is an important feature of the catalyst compositions of the present disclosure. A scanning electron micrograph image of this unique structure is shown in FIG. 6B. Furthermore, enhanced surface area and mesoporosity translates into improved emissions control performance under the highest space velocity conditions (e.g., ≥100,000 hr⁻¹) that can be encountered in a heavy duty diesel aftertreatment system. Comparing item 8 with item 7, the 34% higher catalytic surface area and 18% increase in HK median diameter available for the CuHBC-β-ZB (AP), makes it possible to use lower catalyst washcoat loading; with a potentially lower contribution to system ΔP (i.e., the backpressure on the engine that impacts fuel consumption).

Evidence of the intimate chemical bond between the metal oxide phase and the zeolite phase created in the hybridization process (involving Al and Si incorporation in the resulting metal oxide composition), is presented in Table 3, where ICP, XRD and BET surface area data are presented for SSZ-13 and SAPO-34 Type-A HBC samples.

TABLE 3 Physical Properties of HBC Based on SSZ-13 and SAPO-34. Cu BET Metal Metal Oxide Loading Cu XRD Surface Item Oxide Ionic (wt ± Loading % Area # Catalyst Composition Conductivity 10%) Increase Crystallinity (m²/g) CuSSZ-13 Based Hybrid Binary Catalyst 1 CuSSZ-13 n/a n/a 1.2 n/a 80-90 760 2 CuHBC- Zr = 6.4 Anion 1.2 0 ″ 620 SSZ13-Z 3 CuHBC- Br = 1.4 Cation 3 150 ″ 590 SSZ13-ZB Zr = 3.3 4 CuHBC- Zr = 3.9 Cation 1.4 17 ″ 513 SSZ13-ZV V = 8.1 CuSAPO-34 Based Hybrid Binary Catalyst 5 CuSAPO-34 n/a n/a 1.8 n/a 80-90 648 6 CuHBC- Zr = 7.3 Anion 1.9 6 15 294 SAPO34-Z 7 CuHBC- Ba = 0.6 Cation 2.5 39 14 N/A SAPO34-ZB Zr = 3.9 8 CuHBC- Zr = 5.2 Cation 2.8 56  8 91 SAPO34-ZV V = 5.1 9 CuHBC- Ce = 2.6 Anion 4 122  6 195 SAPO34-ZC Zr = 3.1

In Table 3, the metal oxide component of the HBC compositions were determined by ICP. By way of reference, pure metal oxides have BET surface areas of <100 m²/g.

There are four important conclusions that can be drawn from the data in Table 3, with reference made to Table 2B showing Cu²⁺ loading capacity of various metal oxides prepared under equivalent conditions as the HBC Type-A in the absence of zeolite particles.

1. Item 2 contains SSZ-13 HBC Type-A containing ZrO₂ (a known anionic metal oxide), which exhibits relatively low cationic (i.e., Cu²⁺) binding capacity.

2. Metal oxide hybridized with SSZ-13 listed in Items 3 and 4 have strong cation ion exchange properties, similar to or greater than that of zeolites, and are thus able to bind Cu²⁺.

3. The SSZ-13 based catalyst compositions shown as Items 3 and 4 contain 150% and 17% more Cu²⁺ (respectively), when compared with the amount of Cu²⁺ loaded onto the zeolite component.

4. A zeolite for HBC that is particularly advantageous is one that exhibits good durability, as measured by retention of crystallinity (via XRD) and high surface area (via BET), such as SSZ-13, in contrast to SAPO-34 zeolite. Table 3 shows that SAPO-34 and potentially other zeolites containing heteroatoms (such as phosphorous that potentially introduce added strain into the zeolite lattice structure), are less suited for HBC application due to the dramatic loss of crystallinity and surface area. It is evident from these data that the intimate interaction between structural components of the SAPO-34 zeolite during hybridization with a broad range of different metal oxide compositions effectively destabilized the crystal structure, causing it to collapse and form an amorphous (glassy) relatively low porosity material. Item 9 contains a very dramatic illustration of impact of the hybridization phenomenon on the structural integrity of SAPO-34, In this case, ceria-doped ZrO₂ is a well-known anionic metal oxide with minimal cation binding capacity (see Table 2B, Item 7), but when hybridized to SAPO-34 Type-A this mixed metal oxide shows an extremely high Cu²⁺ binding capacity. The inference drawn from this very surprising result is that the effect of “incidental doping” of the Zr:Ce mixed metal oxide by elements from the deconstruction of the zeolite result in an undefined, high Cu²⁺ binding end product. This inference is supported in a less dramatic way by the data on Item 6 for ZrO₂ metal oxide, which is also a well-known anionic material and would not be expected to bind significant amounts of Cu²⁺ ions (see, Table 2B, line 1).

Presented in Table 4 are the composition data for CuSSZ13 and various HBC derivatives prepared under different process conditions, where copper exchange was conducted with various CuSO₄ concentrations (and incubated at 80° C. for 3 hrs). The compositions were determined by ICP analysis. Items 1-4 in the table illustrates the effect of CuSO₄ concentration on copper loading; which leads to the conclusion that 0.1M (or less) would be optimal for minimizing excessive copper loading for best NOx reduction performance, as demonstrated by U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/486,858. Likewise, the pH 3 conditions used for item 8 suggest that copper loading under such conditions should produce high performance NOx reduction SCR catalysts, with less undesirable CuO formation (and corresponding N₂O-make). Items 10-14 pertain to Type-A HBC compositions, while items 15-19 are Type-B HBC compositions. The most important distinction between the Type-A and Type-B compositions is that the latter show distinctly lower copper loading, which result in lower NOx reduction, as measured by the Standard Reaction (in the absence of NO₂), not shown here.

TABLE 4 Composition of CuSSZ13 and Hybrid Binary Catalyst Prepared Under Various Conditions SSZ-13 ZrO₂-based Mixed Zeolite Metal Oxide Item (wt %) Copper (wt % ± 10) # Catalyst Al Si Loading Zr Ba Co V 1 CuSSZ13 2.8 40.2 0.6 (0.1 M) 2 CuSSZ13 2.8 39.2 0.6 (0.25 M) 3 CuSSZ13 2.7 39 0.8 (0.5 M) 4.1 CuSSZ-13 [A] 2.3 34.7 1 4.2 CuSSZ13 A′ 2.7 40.6 1.2 5.1 CuSSZ13 [B] 2.4 35.9 0.9 5.2 CuSSZ13 B′ 2.8 41.5 1 6.1 CuSSZ13 [C] 2.3 35.5 1 6.2 CuSSZ13 C′ 2.6 40.9 1.2 7.1 CuSSZ13 [D], 2.2 33.7 1.1 18 hr @ 80° C. 7.2 CuSSZ13 D′, 2.7 42 1.3 18 hr @ 80° C. 8 CuSSZ-13 [G], 2.3 35 0.8 pH = 3 9 SSZ-13 2.6 36.6 — (protonated) 10 SSZ13-ZV 2.4 33.9 3.9 8.5 Hybrid 11 CuHBC- 2.5 33.4 1.4 3.9 8.1 SSZ13-ZV (Type-A) 12 CuHBC- 2.4 33.1 1.2 6.5 SSZ13-Z (Type-A) 13 SSZ13-ZB 2.4 34 3.3 5.3 Hybrid (Type-A) 14 CuHBC- 2.4 36.7 2.9 3.3 1.4 SSZ13-ZB (Type-A) 15 (Type-B) 2.5 35.7 0.9 3.1 CuHBC- SSZ13-Z(A) 16 (Type-B) 2.3 35.4 0.8 5.5 CuHBC- SSZ13-Z(B) 17 (Type-B) 2 28.8 0.9 15.2 CuHBC- SSZ13-Z(C) 18 (Type-B) 2.4 35.2 1.1 2.9 1.9 CuHBC- SSZ13-ZB 19 (Type-B) 2.3 33.4 0.4 2.6 8.4 CuHHBC- SSZ13-ZV

The effect of the selected Hybrid Binary Catalyst Synthesis Procedure on copper loading is illustrated in Table 5, where ZSM-5 zeolite is used to compare and contrast Type-A vs Type-B Hybrid Binary Catalyst (where the metal oxide form the SCO phase). The most significant inferences from this data are:

1. Type-A HBC binds significantly more Cu²⁺ under identical incubation conditions, compared with Type-B.

2. Beneficial effect of copper loading might be expected to be greater for Type-A HBC compared with Type-B.

3. Increased metal oxide content of the Type-B HBC had no influence on the copper loading, relative to that of pure CuZSM-5. However, increased diffusion limitation with increased metal oxide coverage of the copper zeolite can result in lower catalytic activity for NOx reduction.

4. Higher copper loading of Hybrid Binary Catalyst materials should be advantageous, provided that this does not facilitate formation of CuO and other species that catalyze N₂O formation and other aging effects.

TABLE 5 Effect of Hybrid Binary Catalyst Synthesis Procedure on Copper Loading ZSM-5 ZrO2-based Mixed Item Catalyst Zeolite Copper Metal oxide # ID Al Si Loading Zr Ba Ce 1 CuZSM-5 2.4 34.8 0.2 2 CuHBC- 2.3 36.9 0.2 3.4 ZSM-5-Z(A) Type B 3 CuHBC- 2.2 37.7 1.1 3.3 ZSM-5-Z(A) Type A 4 CuHBC- 2 31.9 0.2 11.3 ZSM-5-Z(2B) Type B 5 CuHBC- 1.8 29.4 0.2 16.7 ZSM-5-Z(C) Type B 6 HBCZSM- 1.8 29.2 17.5 5-Z(C) 7 CuHBC- 1.6 23.4 0.2 25.3 ZSM-5-Z(D) Type B

ZSM-5 zeolite was used as the model for screening a range of elements (referred to in Table 1), which convey desirable properties to the Hybrid Binary Catalysts of this invention. Table 6 presents the IPC results for Type-A HBC preparations that illustrate the versatility and breadth of the catalyst compositions possible from the present disclosure. Line items 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 20 represent ICP data for metal oxide compositions that have not been copper loaded. The results demonstrate that a wide range of mixed oxides and related stoichiometric compositions may be readily engineered to meet the requisite emission, durability and cost targets.

TABLE 6 Elemental Composition of ZSM-5 Based HBC Containing Various Elements in the SCO Phase Elements ZSM-5 Copper ZrO₂-based Mixed Metal Item in the SCO Zeolite Loading Oxide Composition (wt % ± 10) # Phase HBC Al Si (g) Zr Ba Ce Co Mn P W Mo Ni Ti  1 Nil 2.4 34.8 0.2  2 Nil 2.6 38.3 0.2  3 Zr 2.3 36.5 3.3  4 Zr 2.2 37.7 1.1 3.3  5 Zr, Mo 2.2 36.4 2.9 0.1  6 Zr, Mo 2.1 36.3 1.2 2.8 0.1  7 Zr, Mn 2.1 36.1 2.8 0.8  8 Zr, Mn 2 35.5 1.2 2.8 0.5  9 Zr Ba, P 2.1 30.5 3.2 0.4 1.2 10 Zr, Ba, P 2 35.7 1.4 3.3 0.4 1.1 11 Zr W 2.1 35.2 2.7 4.5 12 Zr, W 1.9 35.4 1 2.7 3.8 13 Zr, W, Mo 2.1 36 2.8 2.3 1 14 Zr, W, Mo 2.1 36 0.9 2.8 1.8 0.4 15 Zr, Co 2 35.1 1.2 3.3 2.8 16 Zr, Ba 2.3 36.4 3.5 2.6 17 Zr, Ba 2.1 35.6 1.5 3.2 2.5 18 Zr, Ba, Co 2.2 34.6 1.5 2.1 1.1 0.8 19 Zr, Ba, Co 2.4 37.5 1.2 2.4 0.9 1.1 20 Zr, Ce 2.2 35.1 2.9 3.8 21 Zr, Ce 2.1 35.9 1.3 2.9 3.9 22 Zr, Ce, Co 2.2 36 1.3 2.2 1.9 1.1 23 Zr, Ni, Co 2.2 36.4 14 2.2 0.8 0.8 24 Zr, P 2.1 36.1 1.2 3 1 25 Zr, Ti 2.1 36.6 1.2 3.4 1.4

FIGS. 6A, 6B, 7, 8, and 9 illustrate the unique physical characteristics of HBC on both standard (i.e., microporous) and mesoporous zeolites. Two of the four different types of zeolites used in this study are depicted (i.e., β-zeolite and SSZ-13).

A combination of scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and elemental analysis has demonstrated that nanoparticles of metal oxides (2-5 nm diameter) can be clearly seen both on the outer surfaces and within mesopores of the zeolite crystals formed by the Type-A HBC procedure. Furthermore, copper was located in both the zeolite and metal oxide when copper exchange was carried out after hybridization of metal oxide to zeolite. However, this was not the case for Type-B HBC hybridization, where copper was primarily associated with the zeolite phase. In addition, Si and Al from the zeolite were also detected in the metal oxide particles. This indicated that the hybridization process involves a direct reaction with surface species in the zeolite. Therefore, metal oxide nanoparticle formation starts with nucleation at the zeolite surface (potentially with the aid of the chelating agent), rather than with metal oxides forming in the bulk solution.

Example 2. Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) Performance of Hybrid Binary Catalyst

The following procedure was used to prepare and test HBC washcoats for NO_(x) reduction in a SCRF (1″×3″) core sample format.

Washcoat Procedure:

21% Cu-Zeolite or HBC catalyst, 73% DI water, 2% lactic acid, 2% poly(ethylene glycol-ran-propylene glycol) ˜2,500 Mn, 2% poly(ethylene oxide) ˜300,000 Mv. This washcoat composition was applied to a (1″×3″) HiSiC 300 cpsi (Dinex) DPF substrate. The coated substrate was dried in air, then at 105° C. (1 hr), and finally calcined at 450° C. (1 hr). Typical catalyst washcoat loading on the substrate by this procedure was in the range of 80-94 g/L.

The obtained catalysts were evaluated for NO_(x) reduction by a dynamic reverse lightoff NO_(x) reduction test and/or a high space velocity equilibrium reverse lightoff NO_(x) reduction test

Dynamic Reverse Lightoff NO_(x) Reduction Testing:

Each core sample was preconditioned at 500° C. in the gas mixture until equilibrium was reached. Then a reverse lightoff test was performed; by allowing the temperature to slowly decrease and monitoring the SCR performance as a function of temperature. The space velocity was 60,000 hr⁻¹, and the following gas mixture was employed: 600 ppm NO; 600 ppm NH₃; 75 ppm ethylene; 300 ppm CO; 10% O₂; 5.6% CO₂; 6% water; and the balance N₂.

High Space Velocity Equilibrium Reverse Lightoff NO_(x) Reduction Testing:

Each core was equilibrated at 450° C. for 30 minutes prior to conducting the test, which is based upon realistic conditions encountered in a heavy duty diesel truck aftertreatment system. A series of equilibrated temperature increments were used, starting from as high as 600° C. The feed gas contained 500 ppm NO_(x); and 600 ppm NH₃; with NO₂/NO_(x)=0, 0.5 and 0.75. Ammonia oxidation was measured with 500 ppm NH₃ only, in order to determine N₂O-make and N₂ selectivity. Also included in the feed stream were 8.7% oxygen and 7.8% water. A total flow of 5,000 NL/min (normal liters per minute) was established through the core, at a space velocity of 100,000 hr⁻¹. These conditions were used as a stress test to determine catalytic activity under realistic conditions, and also to ascertain the adequacy of the catalyst loading on the substrate.

Results are shown in Table 7, and compare three ZrO₂-based HBC catalyst SCRF core samples with a commercial reference (used to calibrate the synthetic gas test bench equipment). Comparing the NO_(x) reduction at low temperatures (i.e., ≤250° C.), it is clear that low temperature performance can be dramatically improved with the HBC. Hence, cold start and close coupled SCR application of such HBC compositions (with no DOC upstream) should afford superior performance than current aftertreatment systems. This is illustrated by CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB, where the metal oxide dramatically increases the NO_(x) reduction at 250° C. relative to the commercial reference SCR catalyst. However, at higher temperatures there is no further increase in the NO_(x) reduction. In addition, this catalyst was shown to produce 10 ppm NO₂ at 500° C. And when tested with NH₃ this catalyst exhibited NH₃ oxidation that resulted in ≥90% N₂ selectivity, which means that this catalyst functions as a very effective AMOX; conducting NO_(x) reduction while preventing NH₃ slip.

It is reasonable to conclude that the hybridization conditions used (with no PEO/PPO employed in the procedure), resulted in considerable blockage of zeolite active sites for the CuHBC—SSZ13 catalyst preparation; resulting in diffusion limitation of reactants getting to the active sites. This diffusion limitation can be overcome in one of three ways:

1. Reduce the metal oxide loading, while increasing the oxidative power of the SCO phase.

2. Maintain the same metal oxide loading while improving the uniformity of the distribution for nanoparticles (in the 2-5 nm diameter range), by inclusion of a surfactant like PEO/PPO in the hybridization step.

3. Blend the given HBC with an unmodified Cu-zeolite to provide additional NO_(x) reduction active sites that are unimpeded by the presence of metal oxide nanoparticles, while the SCO phase is supported on adjacent copper zeolite particles in the same washcoat.

The option described in (3) above is illustrated in Table 7 by the 50% CuSAPO34/50% CuHBC—SSZ13-ZB catalyst, where there was a marked increase in both low and high temperature NO_(x) reduction by blending. This is a very advantageous feature of the disclosure, where relatively inexpensive zeolites may be employed for the HBC component in the blend, while the major component can be selected for its NO_(x) reduction and durability properties

TABLE 7 Dynamic Reverse Lightoff Standard SCR Results for Selected CuSSZ-13 Based HBC NOx Conversion Efficiency Wash- (%) at coat Specific Loading Temperatures Catalyst ID (g/L) 150° C. 200° C. 250° C. 300° C. 350° C. 400° C. 450° C. 500° C. Comments Commercial N/A 3 7 20 47 76 82 82 Internal Reference Control for (2013) test procedure CuHBC- 90 13 40 51 53 53 53 53 48 1. NO₂-make = SSZ13-ZB 10 ppm @ 500° C. 2. NH₃ oxidation ≥ 90% N₂ selective 3. Improved low temp. deNOx 50:50 81 8 45 62 62 66 72 73 68 Improved low Blend of temp. deNOx CuSAPO-34 and CuHBC- SSZ13-ZB CuHBC- 92 3 7 18 31 38 29 0 −28 NO₂-makeup SSZ13-ZV to 22 ppm @ 500° C.

In the case of CuHBC—SSZ13-ZV a unique combination of SRC and DOC (i.e., SCO-like) properties were exhibited over different temperature ranges in Table 7; where NO_(x) reduction peaked at 38% (@ 350° C.), then declined to zero (@ 450° C.) and declined to −28 (@ 500° C.). The latter corresponds to the production of 20 ppm NO₂-make and only 10 ppm N₂O-make at 500° C. The DOC-like behavior of the CuHBC—SSZ13-ZV SCRF core sample was verified in DOC testing (not shown here), and suggests that zirconium-vanadium containing HBC would be a good catalyst for PGM impregnation to create a DOC, or even to form the basis of a 4-way catalyst system.

The result of the high space velocity equilibrium reverse lightoff SCR performance stress test for a CuHBC-β-ZBCoP is presented in Table 8. The highlighted (NO₂/NO_(x)=0.5) test conditions depict test results that are directly equivalent to those obtained by J. H. Kwak et al., “The Effect of Hydrothermal Aging on a Commercial Cu SCR Catalyst”, Directions in Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research, MI, Oct. 5, 2011, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, for β-zeolite (fresh, where the space velocity was only 30,000 hr⁻¹. This result is of important for the following reasons:

1. 50% lower catalyst washcoat loading on the substrate can be employed to meet the performance requirement of SCR under realistic operating conditions; with only 84 g/L, compared with about 160 g/L or more for commercial catalysts.

2. This is made possible due to the enhanced BET surface area and mesoporosity imparted to the catalyst as a result of the hybridization process. In this process the surfactant (PEP/PPO) is utilized to achieve optimal nanoparticle size (i.e., 2-5 nm diameter) and uniformity of distribution on the surface of the zeolite particles. The structure described here is illustrated in FIG. 6B for a similar catalyst composition, and the enhanced BET surface area and mesoporosity are likewise illustrated in Table 2B line item 8.

TABLE 8 Equilibrium Reverse Lightoff NO_(x) Reduction for CuHBC-β-zeolite-ZBCoP (AP) Key Equilibrium Temperature Profile (° C.) Parameters Reaction 180° C. 220° C. 300° C. 400° C. 500° C. 600° C. NO₂/NO_(x) = 0 Standard SCR (%) 9.9 26 38.6 46.7 65.1 76.3 N₂O-make (ppm) 1 2.4 1.2 1.2 4.4 7.4 NO₂/NO_(x) = 0.5 Fast SCR (%) 45.5 69.4 88.1 90.1 89.4 N₂O-make (ppm) 55.4 74.1 46.7 31.1 30 NO₂/NO_(x) = 0.75 Fast SCR (%) 95.3 95.8 91.6 N₂O-make (ppm) 94.6 70.3 58.3 NH₃ only Oxidation to form 0.1 0.7 N₂O (ppm)

Example 3. Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) Properties of Hybrid Binary Catalysts Washcoat Procedure

Washcoats were applied to (1″×3″) HiSiC 300 cpsi (Dinex) DPF substrate as described in Example 3. Platinum group metal (PGM) catalyst was applied by an incipient wetness impregnation method, with nitrate precursor compounds dissolved in 10 mL ID water. The solution containing precursors was applied and a very low vacuum was used to ensure a uniform distribution of PGM throughout the core. A dynamic reverse lightoff protocol for DOC performance was used for testing, starting by first equilibrating at 600° C. The following feed gas mixture was used at space velocity 60,000 hr⁻¹: 600 ppm NO; 75 ppm ethylene; 25 ppm propylene; 7.5 ppm propane; 300 ppm CO; 10% O₂; 5.6% CO₂; 6% water; and the balance N₂. The use of propane and propylene served as a more realistic model for determining the ability of the catalyst to effectively handle volatile organic compounds (VOC), which are a serious challenge in diesel engine emissions control.

Low PGM DOC compositions of Hybrid Binary Catalysts are presented in Table 9, where zirconium-vanadium and zirconium-barium metal oxides are hybridized to (3-zeolite. The following are the main conclusions from these data:

1. Hybrid Binary Catalysts that do not contain PGM are highly capable of hydrocarbon oxidation. Particularly noteworthy is the oxidative ability for unsaturated, relatively long chain hydrocarbons (illustrated by the propylene data). In the case of CuHBC-β-ZB (AP), line item 3 in Table 9, propylene lightoff temperature is lower and the percent conversion is higher than that for carbon monoxide. Conventional wisdom believes that exothermic lightoff of CO is required to facilitate the lightoff of other species such as HC and NO. Here, the earlier lightoff and extremely high level of conversion of unsaturated hydrocarbons was unexpected and surprising in the absence of PGM. This feature has been engineered into the catalyst by employing zirconium as the primary metal oxide component, which when doped with other elements create oxygen vacancies (thus active oxidation sites) at the surfaces. Furthermore, by employing barium as the dopant, a degree of NO_(x) storage behavior is also afforded to the resulting mixed metal oxides. The result is a rudimentary ability to lightoff NO at the moderately low temperature of 350° C., and percent conversion efficiency

2. Impregnating such HBC with relatively low quantities of PGM dramatically improves lightoff and percent conversion for all species tested (see item 4, Table 9). Indeed, 1-2 orders of magnitude lower PGM containing HBC catalysts have exhibited competitive DOC performance to the commercial DOC reference used in this study.

3. Both zirconium-vanadium and zirconium-barium based HBC compositions have been demonstrated to be very effective substrates for low PGM loading DOC; and are particularly suited for HC oxidation. This makes these DOC catalysts ideal candidates for partial oxidation catalysts (POC), hence volatile organic compound (VOC) removal; and for 4-way catalyst applications.

4. The oxidative power of zirconium-barium based HBC can be systematically modulated (both the magnitude and selectivity) by careful selection of co-dopants. This is illustrated by comparing the DOC behavior of the catalysts compositions in line item 6, 8 and 9 at the same level of PGM loading, but different metal oxide phase composition. The most dramatic impact of starting with CuHBC-β-ZB (line 6) and including cobalt dopant to the zirconium-barium mixed oxide (line 8) is evident, and the further inclusion of phosphorous as yet another dopant to make a 4-component mixed metal oxide is illustrated in the CO, propane and NO_(x) lightoff and % conversion.

-   -   a. In the case of adding cobalt as an additional dopant to the         zirconium-barium mixed metal oxide, the lightoff temperature for         the saturated hydrocarbon (propane) was dramatically reduced.         But for NO there is no significant change.     -   b. Likewise, where phosphorus was added to the         zirconium-barium-cobalt mixed metal oxide, there was a dramatic         reduction in the CO lightoff temperature (by over 40° C.)         accompanied by a dramatic increase in NO lightoff (by 40° C.),         along with a large decreasing in NO conversion. This selectivity         is clearly related to changes in the metal oxide properties and         not PGM catalyst poisoning.

Thus, these data illustrate the ability of the catalysts of the present disclosure to systematically engineer the properties of the metal oxide (SCO) phase for hybrid binary catalysts in terms of both oxidative power and resistance to poisons such as phosphorous and even sulfur.

TABLE 9 Low PGM Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) Performance of Hybrid Binary Catalyst DOC Reverse Lightoff Temp Max Conversion Item Catalyst PGM Content (g/L) (C°) Efficiency (%) # ID Pd Rh Pt CO C₃H₆ C₂H₆ NO C₃H₈ CO C₃H₆ C₂H₆ NO C₃H₈ 1 CuHBC- 0.1 nil 0.05 150 125 175 nil 250 83 95 69 nil 21 β-ZBV 2 CuHBC- 0.1 0.05 nil 125 125 160 310 250 99 100 98 18 90 β-ZBV 3 CuHBC- nil nil nil 175 150 220 350 360 56 100 60 2 19 β-ZB (AP) 4 CuHBC- 0.01 0.025 0.05 150 150 185 235 175 100 100 100 34 99 β-ZB (AP) 5 CuHBC- 0.05 nil 0.05 170 <125 180 185 <125 75 86 49 9 ~40 β-ZB (AP) 6 CuHBC- 0.1 nil 0.1 150 <125 180 185 460 92 97 80 19 ~10 β-ZB (AP) 7 CuHBC- 0.5 nil 0.5 125 <125 170 175 420 86 96 76 29 ~25 β-ZB (AP) 8 CuHBC- 0.1 nil 0.1 165 125 180 190 <150 97 100 86 20 ~40 β-ZBCo (AP) 9 CuHBC- 0.1 nil 0.1 <125 170 190 230 ~150 97 100 86 8 ~30 β-ZBCoP (AP) 10 Commercial Zone <<150 170 170 170 320 100 100 100 52 93 DOC Coated (>1 g/L Pt & Pd)

1. By increasing the PGM content to 0.5 g/L for both Pt and Pd, it was possible to achieve legitimate DOC catalytic performance for NO conversion and dramatically lower propylene lightoff (by >45° C.); comparing line items 7 and 19.

2. Experimental evidence in item 2 and 4 suggest that even better DOC performance can be achieved by incorporating Rh (along with Pt and Pd) in low PGM DOC compositions. This is potentially due to the enhancement of the already significant contribution of the following oxidative reactions due to the formation of palladium hydride (and rhodium hydride) intermediates:

(i) Steam-Hydrocarbon Reforming Reaction R—CH₃+H₂O═R—H+CO+2H₂  (Endothermic]

(ii) Water-Gas Reaction CO+H₂O═CO₂+H₂  [Exothermic]

Example 4. Urea Hydrolysis Catalyst Properties of Hybrid Binary Catalysts

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was used to analyze HBC Type-B samples, using 50% urea solution, N₂ purge gas and 10° C./min thermal ramp from room temperature to 600° C. The study involved placing 14 (±1) mg of catalyst into an alumina TGA pan, followed by 40 (±1) mg of a 50% urea solution. Thermal transitions from several replicate profiles were obtained and analyzed to determine the temperature at which total decomposition of the urea solution was achieved (i.e., Td).

The results show that the HBC composition (CuHBC-ZSM5-Z (A) Type-B) was more effective in urea decomposing urea to produce ammonia by lowering Td by 38.3° C. (±0.3), relative to the conventional hydrolysis catalyst (TiO₂). This catalyst composition was 8% ZrO₂ hybridized onto CuZSM-5 (after copper exchange and annealing of the zeolite). Therefore, this catalyst was also found to be an effective NO_(x) reduction catalyst. ZrO₂-based hydrolysis catalysts were described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/486,858, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

TABLE 10 Urea Hydrolysis and NO_(x) Reduction Catalyst Performance of Zirconia-based HBC Peak NO_(x) Test Wt % ZrO₂ Copper ΔT vs Reduction Conditions Hybridized Loading Td TiO₂ (NO₂-free) 50% Urea n/a n/a 393.1° C. n/a n/a 50% Urea/ n/a n/a 392.1° C. n/a n/a TiO₂ 50% Urea/ 8 0.2 wt % 353.8° C. 38.3 28% CuHBC- (±0.3)° C. ZSM5- Z(A) 50% Urea/ 35 0.2 wt % 379.1° C. 13.0 45% CuHBC- (±0.3)° C. ZSM5- Z(C) 50% Urea/ 50 0.2 wt % 399.2° C. −7.1 — CuHBC- (±0.3)° C. ZSM5- Z(D)

Examples 5. 4-Way Catalyst Compositions

Examples of 4-way catalyst compositions in Table 11 are based upon specific data presented in Examples 2-4.

TABLE 11 4-Way Catalyst Configurations Based on data from Example 2-4 Urea DOC (POC) REDUCTANT Hydrolysis Zone Zone Zone SCR on DPF Zone AMOX Zone 1. CuHBC- UREA CuHBC- 1. CuHBC- CuHBC- SSZ13-ZV/ SSZ13- SSZ13-ZB(AP) SSZ13-ZB(AP) ≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] ZrO2(AP) 2. CuHBC- 2. CuHBC-β- SSZ13-ZBCo(AP) ZB(AP)/≥0.1 g/L 3. Blend: [Pt—Rh—Pd] CuSSZ-13/ 3. CuHBC-β- CuHBC-SSZ13- ZBCo(AP) ZB(AP) ≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] 4. CuHBC- SSZ13- ZBCoP(AP) 1. CuHBC- Hydrogen Not Applicable 1. CuHBC- Not Applicable SSZ13-ZV/ SSZ13-ZB(AP) ≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] 2. CuHBC- 2. CuHBC-β- SSZ13-ZBCo(AP) ZB(AP)/≥0.1 g/L ≥0.01 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] [Pt—Rh—Pd] 3. CuHBC- 3. CuHBC-β- SSZ13-ZBCo(AP) ZBCo(AP) ≥0.01 g/L Pd ≥0.1 g/L [Pt—Rh—Pd] 4. CuHBC- SSZ13- ZBCoP(AP) ≥0.01 g/L Ni

Two exemplary 4-Way Catalyst scenarios are provided below:

1. Urea Reductant Scenario

The urea hydrolysis zone can be required when urea reductant upstream of the SCRF or SCR zone. This catalyst is selected to both enhance urea hydrolysis kinetics and can simultaneously contribute to NO_(x) reduction.

The DOC or POC (i.e., partial oxidation catalyst) zone facilitates NO lightoff for NO₂-make and provides effective HC oxidation for VOC (important soot components in the exhaust stream). As such, the POC is coated onto a substrate with up to about 50% retention for particulates, so that the catalyst may oxidize the retained component. This provides a major benefit by reducing the amount of soot entering the SCR on DPF zone of the filter. Note also that the HBC compositions are selected to contribute to NO_(x) reduction, by virtue of the SCR/SOC nature of the binary catalyst.

The SCR on DPF (i.e., SCRF) zone conducts the majority of the NO_(x) reduction; in addition to passively oxidizing soot to form ash. This zone further serves as a storage chamber for the ash, until an “ash-cleaning” event is required. The intervals between ash-cleaning are markedly prolonged by the inclusion of the POC zone, thus reducing maintenance costs.

The AMOX zone provides a level of insurance against ammonia slip from the tailpipe, while carrying out NO_(x) reduction. Optionally, the use of relatively small amounts of PGM (e.g., in the 0.01 g/L range) may also be employed to provide an addition level of safety against ammonia slip.

2. Hydrogen Reductant Scenario

It is evident from Table 11 that with hydrogen reductant the 4-way catalyst is dramatically reduced in size, complexity and cost. The increased space can be used in a myriad of ways, such as to house an onboard H₂ generator.

While illustrative embodiments have been described above, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.

Illustrative, non-exclusive examples of descriptions of some methods and compositions in accordance with the scope of the present disclosure are presented in the following numbered paragraphs. The following paragraphs are not intended to be an exhaustive set of descriptions, and are not intended to define minimum or maximum scopes, or required elements or steps, of the present disclosure. Rather, they are provided as illustrative examples of selected methods and compositions that are within the scope of the present disclosure, with other descriptions of broader or narrower scopes, or combinations thereof, not specifically listed herein still being within the scope of the present disclosure.

A1. An engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, including:

a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles hybridized to a metal zeolite,

wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 50 nm.

A2. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraph Al, wherein the metal oxide is hybridized to atoms located on a portion of an exterior surface of the metal zeolite.

A3. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraphs A1 or A2, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 30 nm.

A4. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraphs A1 or A2, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 10 nm.

A5. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraphs A1 or A2, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 5 nm.

A6. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A5, wherein the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition has from 0.5 to 30 wt % of a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles.

A7. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A6, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from cerium oxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, aluminum oxide, silicon oxide, hafnium oxide, vanadium oxide, niobium oxide, tantalum oxide, chromium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, ruthenium oxide, rhodium oxide, iridium oxide, nickel oxide, barium oxide, yttrium oxide, scandium oxide, calcium oxide, barium oxide, manganese oxide, lanthanum oxide, strontium oxide, cobalt oxide, and any combination thereof.

A8. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A6, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from the group consisting of zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, cerium oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, cobalt oxide, titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, barium oxide, and any combination thereof.

A9. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraphs A1 to A8, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle further comprises a cationic dopant.

A10. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraph A9, wherein the cationic dopant is an oxide comprising Mg²⁺, Cu²⁺Cu+, Ni²⁺, Ti⁴⁺, V⁴⁺, Nb⁴⁺, Ta⁵⁺, Cr³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Mo³⁺, W⁶⁺, W³⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺, Zn²⁺, Ga³⁺, A13+, In³⁺, Ge⁴⁺, Si⁴⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Ba²⁺, La³⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Nb⁵⁺, Sr²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, or any combination thereof.

A11. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraphs A9 or A10, wherein the cationic dopant is an oxide comprising Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Rh²⁺.

A12. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A11, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from CeO₂:ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:CeO₂, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr and Ca, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba, Zr, and Co, TiO₂:CeO₂, ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba_(0.1)V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr, Ba, and V, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, each optionally comprising a cationic dopant comprising an oxide of Ba²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and any combination thereof.

A13. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one Paragraphs A1 to A11, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr, and CeO₂:ZrO₂.

A14. The engine after treatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A13, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle further comprises phosphorus.

A15. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A14, wherein the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition has from 70 wt % to 99.5 wt % of the metal zeolite.

A16. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A15, wherein the metal zeolite is selected from aluminosilicate zeolites and silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites.

A17. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A16, wherein the metal zeolite further comprises a cation selected from Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Fe³⁺, and wherein the metal zeolite optionally comprises an alkali metal ion selected from Na⁺ and K⁺.

A18. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A17, wherein the metal zeolite is selected from Fe-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Fe- and Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolites, Fe-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites, Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites, and Fe and Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolites.

A19. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A17, wherein the metal zeolite is a Fe and/or Cu-doped silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite, and Fe- and/or Cu-doped aluminosilicate zeolite, in combination.

A20. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A18, wherein the metal zeolite is selected from Fe-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, and Fe and Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite.

A21. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A18, wherein the metal zeolite is selected from ZSM-5, β-zeolite, SSZ-13 chabazite, and SAPO-34.

A22. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A21, wherein the catalyst composition has a thermal resistance of up to 600° C.

A23. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A22, wherein the catalyst composition has a BET surface area of at least 200 m²/g.

A24. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A23, wherein the catalyst composition is a diesel oxidation catalyst.

A25. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A23, wherein the catalyst composition is a diesel particulate filter catalyst.

A26. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A23, wherein the catalyst composition is a selective catalytic reduction catalyst.

A27. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A23, wherein the catalyst composition is a urea hydrolysis catalyst.

A28. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A23, wherein the catalyst composition is an ammonia oxidation catalyst.

A29. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraph A27, wherein the urea hydrolysis catalyst has a NO_(x) conversion efficiency of at least 10%, when coated onto a surface of an impact static mixer, and wherein the urea hydrolysis catalyst is capable of decomposing urea to produce ammonia reductant in a diesel engine exhaust stream.

A30. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraph A27 or A29, wherein the urea hydrolysis catalyst binds and oxidizes SCR catalyst poisons.

A31. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of Paragraph A30, wherein the SCR catalyst poisons comprise hydrocarbons, sulfur, or a combination thereof.

A32. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A27 and A29 to A31, wherein the urea hydrolysis catalyst is a sacrificial catalyst.

A33. A method of making an engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, comprising:

providing an aqueous solution comprising a chelating agent and a metal oxide precursor selected from ZrOCl₂.8H₂O, NaVO₃, BaCl₂, (NH₄)₆Ce⁴⁺(NO₃)₄, KMnO₄, Co(NO₃)₂, Cr(NO₃)₃, CaCl₂, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, nickel nitrate, titanium chloride, and tungsten chloride;

mixing the aqueous solution comprising the chelating agent and the metal oxide precursor with a metal zeolite to provide a metal oxide precursor-coated metal zeolite, and

calcining the metal oxide precursor-coated metal zeolite to provide the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition,

wherein the engine after treatment catalyst composition comprises a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles bound to the metal zeolite.

A34. The method of Paragraph A33, wherein the metal zeolite is selected from an aluminosilicate zeolite and silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite.

A35. The method of Paragraph A34, wherein the aluminosilicate zeolite is selected from SSZ-13 chabazite, ZSM-5, SAPO-34, and β-zeolite.

A36. The method of Paragraph A34, wherein the silico-alumino-phosphate zeolite is SAPO-34.

A37. A method of reducing NO_(x) in diesel engine exhaust in a selective catalytic reduction system, comprising:

exposing a NO_(x)-containing diesel engine exhaust to a catalyst composition of any one of Paragraphs A1 to A32,

wherein the catalyst composition is disposed on or within a catalyst support structure.

A38. The method of Paragraph A37, wherein the catalyst support structure is selected from a ceramic monolith and a metallic substrate.

A39. The method of Paragraph A37 or Paragraph A38, wherein the catalyst composition is capable of decomposing urea deposits.

A40. The method of any one of Paragraphs A37 to A39, wherein the catalyst composition increases NO_(x) reduction under cold start conditions. 

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
 1. An engine aftertreatment catalyst composition, comprising: a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles hybridized to a metal-doped zeolite via covalent bonds, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 50 nm; and wherein: the metal-doped zeolite is deconstructed at the surface; and Si, Al, P, or any combination thereof from the metal-doped zeolite surface is incorporated into the metal oxide nanoparticles; the metal-doped zeolite comprises a zeolite doped with a metal cation selected from Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, and Fe³⁺, and wherein the zeolite has a pore size of less than 5 Å; and the metal oxide nanoparticle comprises a metal oxide selected from cerium oxide, titanium oxide, zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, chromium oxide, molybdenum oxide, tungsten oxide, iron oxide, nickel oxide, barium oxide, yttrium oxide, lanthanum oxide, calcium oxide, manganese oxide, cobalt oxide, and any combination thereof.
 2. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is hybridized to atoms located on a portion of an exterior surface of the metal-doped zeolite.
 3. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 30 nm.
 4. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 10 nm.
 5. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle has a maximum dimension of from 0.1 to 5 nm.
 6. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition has from 0.5 to 30 wt % of a plurality of metal oxide nanoparticles.
 7. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from the group consisting of zirconium oxide, vanadium oxide, cerium oxide, manganese oxide, chromium oxide, cobalt oxide, titanium oxide, tungsten oxide, barium oxide, and any combination thereof.
 8. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle further comprises a cationic dopant.
 9. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 8, wherein the cationic dopant is an oxide comprising Mg²⁺, Cu²⁺, Cu+Ni²⁺, Ti⁴⁺, V⁴⁺, Nb⁴⁺, Ta⁵⁺, Cr³⁺, Zr⁴⁺, Mo³⁺, W⁶⁺, W³⁺, Mn²⁺, Fe³⁺, Zn²⁺, Ga³⁺, Al³⁺, In³⁺, Ge⁴⁺, Si⁴⁺, Co²⁺, Ni²⁺, Ba²⁺, La³⁺, Ce⁴⁺, Nb⁵⁺, Sr²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, and any combination thereof.
 10. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 8, wherein the cationic dopant is an oxide comprising Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, and Rh²⁺.
 11. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from CeO₂:ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:CeO₂, BaZrO₃, Zr_(0.8)Sr_(0.2)CoO₃, Zr_(0.9)Ca_(0.1)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Zr and Ca, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)Mn₃O₄, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CoO_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba, Zr, and Co, TiO₂:CeO₂, ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.3)Ba₀₁V_(0.6)O_(x) where x is an amount of 0 that counterbalances Zr, Ba, and V, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, each optionally comprising a cationic dopant comprising an oxide of Ba²⁺, Pt²⁺, Pd²⁺, Rh²⁺, Ru²⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Fe³⁺, and any combination thereof.
 12. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle is selected from ZrO₂, Y₂O₃:ZrO₂, ZrV₂O₇, TiO₂:ZrV₂O₇, Zr_(0.5)Ba_(0.5)CrO₃, Ba_(0.3)Zr_(0.7)O_(x) where x is an amount of O that counterbalances Ba and Zr, and CeO₂:ZrO₂.
 13. The engine after treatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide nanoparticle further comprises phosphorus.
 14. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition has from 70 wt % to 99.5 wt % of the metal-doped zeolite.
 15. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal-doped zeolite comprises a zeolite doped with a metal cation selected from Cu²⁺ and Fe³⁺.
 16. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the zeolite in the metal-doped zeolite is selected from chabazite and SAPO-34.
 17. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the metal-doped zeolite is selected from Fe-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite, and Fe and Cu-doped aluminosilicate chabazite.
 18. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 16, wherein the zeolite in the metal-doped zeolite is selected from SSZ-13 chabazite and SAPO-34.
 19. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the catalyst composition has a thermal resistance of up to 600° C.
 20. The engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the catalyst composition has a BET surface area of at least 200 m²/g.
 21. A diesel oxidation catalyst, comprising the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 22. A diesel particulate filter catalyst, comprising the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 23. A selective catalytic reduction catalyst, comprising the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 24. A urea hydrolysis catalyst, comprising the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 25. An ammonia oxidation catalyst, comprising the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 26. A method of making an engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim 1, comprising: providing an aqueous solution comprising a chelating agent and a metal oxide precursor selected from ZrOCl₂.8H₂O, NaVO₃, BaCl₂, (NH₄)₆Ce⁴⁺(NO₃)₄, KMnO₄, Co(NO₃)₂, Cr(NO₃)₃, CaCl₂, barium nitrate, ortho phosphoric acid, ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate, calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, nickel nitrate, titanium chloride, and tungsten chloride; mixing the aqueous solution comprising the chelating agent and the metal oxide precursor with a metal-doped zeolite to provide a metal oxide precursor-coated metal-doped zeolite, and calcining the metal oxide precursor-coated metal-doped zeolite to provide the engine aftertreatment catalyst composition of claim
 1. 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the zeolite in the metal-doped zeolite is selected from chabazite and SAPO-34.
 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the zeolite in the metal doped zeolite is selected from SSZ-13 chabazite and SAPO-34.
 29. A method of reducing NO_(x) in diesel engine exhaust in a selective catalytic reduction system, comprising: exposing a NO_(x)-containing diesel engine exhaust to a catalyst composition of claim 1, wherein the catalyst composition is disposed on or within a catalyst support structure.
 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the catalyst support structure is selected from a ceramic monolith and a metallic substrate.
 31. The method of claim 29, further comprising decomposing urea deposits by the catalyst composition.
 32. The method of claim 29, further comprising reducing NO_(x) by the catalyst composition under cold start conditions. 